My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
06-17-1996 Planning Packet
Orono
>
Planning Commission
>
1996
>
06-17-1996 Planning Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/13/2023 3:21:07 PM
Creation date
9/13/2023 3:17:23 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
227
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION <br />MEETING HELD ON MAY 20. 1996 <br />“ ^^l.>5 P<iui djiti Sue HciliuiKi - CoiiUriueU) <br />The hardcover in the 0-75' setback exists at 1200 s f and 900 s f in the 75-250' zone <br />The proposal would increase these calailafi<ins hy 85 % f in the 0-75’ ami to 17Rt « f <br />the 75.250' 7one The overall allowed hardcover of 250j. i, 2724 s f and is proposed <br />3‘363 s f, an increase of appro>amate!y 300 s.f over the allowable <br />mt <br />nt <br />Galfron cominued that this is also a bhiff situation The addition to the bulk of the <br />structure would have an impact. Grading ivould also be required within the bluff im.pacl <br />zone for the drivewav Gaffron said the bluff impact is minor, however, when compared <br />to other issues involved <br />A main concern is with the septic system for the property The current septic system is <br />non-conlbrming aiul requires replacement, for which a site exists There is. however, no <br />available alternate site on the property for the proposed 3-bedroom house The <br />neighborhood is proposed for sewering but this is an unresolved issue Gaffron <br />questioned whether the house should be expanded to 3 bedrooms without an alternate site <br />or withhold final approval until the sewer issue is determined <br />Applicant, Paul Hedlund, said the property was very unusual. It is their intent to keep the <br />home intact and build onto it as opposed to tearing it down and starting over with new <br />construction <br />Peterson commented on the large number of variances for the application He noted that, <br />although the property deserx es to have a home on it, the applicant needs to work with <br />Staff to make it a viable proposal Hedlund said he sees the plan as the best for the <br />property and reiterated the purchase was contingent on City approval. <br />Stoddard acknowledged the good design and elev ations, but asked the applicant if he <br />would consider moving the garage to the west Sue HeJIuiul said the west side of the lot <br />was steep and questioned the encroachment of the bluff area Paul Hedlund also noted <br />that the well w as located on the w est side of the property <br />During public comments, Charles Truman, who lives across the street from this property, <br />voiced his approval of the proposal He said it would cause no hardship to the <br />neighborhood
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.