06-17-1996 Planning Packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLAN?s.T\G COXfMISSION MEETING HELD ON MAY 20 lv% Smith moved. Lindquist seconded, to deny approval of the after-the-fact deck The stair landing \\z% apprnvetl with the comlition that the applicant work with .Start'to meet the 90-100 s f compliance for «air landing <ii7e \'ote Aye^ ^ Nays 0 The applicant was inlormed that the application would go to the second Council meeting in June !t was noted for the record that the Planning Commission was not concerned with the stainvay to the lake but would like to see the City work with the applicant in meeting si/e requirements. {f*S) #2135 PAUL AND SUE HEDLUND. 1575 LONG LAKE BLVD. - VARIANCES - PUBLIC HEARING 8:2S-9:12 P .M. The Affidavit ot Publication and Certificate of Mailinu were noted. The .Applicants was present. Gaffron reported that the property in question was a .V4 acre lot. the bulk of which is locatetl in the 0-7S' setback, with 17,600 s f in the 0-7S’ setback and 11,000 s f in the 75- 250' setback The house on the property is small and mostly located within the '' 75' setback The single car garage encroaches into the right-of-way GatTron said the proposal to purchase the property is conti.ngent on appros al of the additions .An addition is proposed to the rear, non-lakcsidc of the house, but still partially in the 0-75’ setback, A second stoty is also planjted. The garage will be remo\ ed and replaced by a 2-car attached earaqe Gaftron informed the Planning Commission that the variances required for this proposal are for hardcover, side setback to the east, proposed at 18' where 30’ is required, and street setback The attached garage requires a 50' street setback and is proposed at 1’. Gaftron said Staft' recommends a 10’ setback to the street lot line T he normal setback for a detached earage, when doors are to the side, is 10', which Gaft'ron said should be strived for Gaffron reported that the average depth of the lot is such that there is no buildable envelope The existing house does not meet setbacks Any upward changes results in visual impacts Gaft'ron said it should be noted that the height of the stmctiire he limited to 2 stories If this limit w as not placed in the resolution, the structure could be built to 2- 1./2 stories .'\ny more than 2 stories would not fit the neighborhood and would be disproportionate from the street view A letter from the neighbor to the east stated his opposition to allowing a side setback less than the 30’ requirement Gaft'ron said there could be ramifications to changing the garage to the other end of the house. i A