My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
07-15-1996 Planning Packet
Orono
>
Planning Commission
>
1996
>
07-15-1996 Planning Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/13/2023 3:12:51 PM
Creation date
9/13/2023 3:07:42 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
264
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Zoning File #2149 <br />July 10,1996 <br />Page 3 <br />proposed or amended, there will be approximately 292.9 s.f. for garage and driveway. <br />A modest two stall garage at 20'x22' affords 440 s.f. of new hardcover. If garage is <br />approved with a 1 O' street setback (doors facing aw ay from street), dri\ e w ill create <br />some 200 s.f± additional hardcover and require the granting of an excessive side <br />setback variance due to the narrowness of lot at street side (42'). Review Exhibits K- <br />2 and L, note locations of garages at 2807 and 2813. <br />3.In response to issues 3 and 4, staff has reviewed the files for both 2807 and 2813 <br />Casco Point Road. The.”e is no record of variances or permits being issued for the <br />detached garages nor is there any record of a permit being issued for the play <br />structure located less than 10' from side lot line (2813 Casco Point Road). Review <br />Exhibit K1,2813 was granted a side setback variance of 6 inches for a major addition <br />at applicant's east side lot line. <br />Applicant may be best advised to table the current applicant and to weigh options and preferences <br />in regard to new improvements. Is a detached garage more important than a screen porch? Can <br />members provide guidelines to applicant in preparing an amended plan of improvement as follows: <br />A.Review Exhibits K2. L and O, will members grant a side setback variance where <br />garages are located l'± from the side lot line? At the 10' setback garage doors must <br />face away from street and a backout apron provided on side. At a 30' setback a <br />garage would meet tlic required side and street setbacks but hardcover variances <br />within the 75-250' setback area would be require'? '440 s.f ^arage minimum and 350 <br />s.f for driveway at a 30' setback, total harder ,.f). What would Planning <br />Commission members prefer? Side setback va,ttuive with garage at 10' setback or <br />hardcover variance where structure would meet all required setbacks? What is the <br />impact on applicant's street yard (screen porch at rear). <br />B.Will members allow any further encroachment of average lakeshore setback line for <br />a reduced screen pwreh? - - An open deck with no upper level deck? <br />C.\Miat is Planning Commission's position on upper level deck where we are dealing <br />with an average lakeshore setback variance. <br />Planning Commission Action <br />If applicant wishes to proceed with application as proposed and as set forth in the legal notice, <br />Plaruiing Commission members may act on plan as proposed or amended by Planning Commission. <br />If applicant wishes to amend the application to include a detached garage, staff must ask that the <br />current application be tabled and a new legal notice published with written notice to neighbors. <br />Applicant to provide amended site plan and hardcover facts. <br />I
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.