My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
07-15-1996 Planning Packet
Orono
>
Planning Commission
>
1996
>
07-15-1996 Planning Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/13/2023 3:12:51 PM
Creation date
9/13/2023 3:07:42 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
264
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
July 12,1996 <br />Page 7 <br />#2154 John O'Sullivan. 2380 Shadywood Road - Sketch Plan Review <br />111. Commercial Site Plan - Preliminary (Conceptual) Review <br />This conceptual review is intended to perform two functions: <br />A. Raise potential concerns and issues with the site plan submitted by the applicant <br />in the context of B-5 zoning. <br />Assist applicant in understanding the variety of information necessar>' in <br />proceeding with a formal rezoning/vacation/commercial site plan review' <br />application. <br />B. <br />1. B-5 Performance Standards . <br />- Lot Area. Width : Upon legal combination, the property will meet the required <br />20,000 s.f. area and 100' width standards of the B-5 zone. <br />Building Setbacks: Required building setbacks are 15' from a side lot line, and <br />35' from front, rear, side street and 'R' District lot lines. The proposed <br />setback from Olive Avenue to the Office building scales out at <br />approximately 13' where a 35 ’ setback is required. If the vacation of <br />Navarre Lane does not occur, the Bank will also have to be relocated to <br />meet a 35' side street setback. <br />- Yard Requirements : Required yards ore 20' front, 30' rear, 15' side yard adjacent <br />to 'R' District, 10' side yard adjacent to street. The primary impact is that <br />off-street parking is not allowed within the required front yard, but is <br />allowed to within 10' of a side lot line abutting an 'R' District and within <br />10' of a rear lot line abutting an 'R' District. A 10' front yard variance <br />is required under the current parking proposal. <br />"Through-Lot" Status: This property is considered a 'through' lot by definition <br />(Section 10.02. Def 42) and has two front lot lines for applying the <br />zoning chapter; this has an impact in the parking setback requirement, in <br />that off street parking will not be allowed within the 20' of the Olive <br />Avenue right-of-way (Proposed plan meets this requirement). <br />Fencing : Code requires a fence or compact evergreen hedge no less than 50% <br />opaque nor less than 6 feet in height along the lot lines abutting an 'R' <br />District, except within the required front yard. Question: Given the <br />definition of the Olive Avenue frontage as a front lot line, will the <br />City require screening along that lot line? The site plan submitted for <br />the formal application should include a landscaping and screening plan. <br />Building Design and Construction : Exterior wall finish requirements of Section <br />10.44 Subd. 6(G) must be met (Requires face brick, natural stone, textured <br />precast concrete or equivalent). <br />- Drainage : The site plan incorporates use of a stormwater pond used jointly with <br />the restaurant parcel, located on the church site. Applicants are currently
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.