Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION <br />MEETING HELD ON JULY 15. 19% <br />(#9 - *^2154 John O'Sullivan/Eruin Smith - Continued) <br />Peterson said he would not have envisioned changing the zoning one year ago but now <br />views it differently, noting a recent proposal lurther south on Shadvwood for a minor <br />rezoning from residential to commercial for an automotive graphics business He <br />suggested the two sites be considered together There are two residential lots combined <br />with the lot that was considered for the auto graphics site Berg said she did not believe <br />the Commission would want to tie the two properties together Goetten said the back lots <br />were zoned residential, and the applicants had proposed rezoning Goetten said the <br />Council wanted to look at all of Navarre before making any changes <br />In discussing whether to look at Navarre as a whole or property by property, Lindquist <br />said it could not alt he dr»ne at once Lindquist saw the need tor developers to make <br />an>lhing happen and rezoning alone would not accomplish anything <br />Berg cited an example in Minneapolis of a neighborhood revitalization She said the <br />business owners had to be convinced to become involved by offering incentives Mabusth <br />later noted in the meeting that the business owners back in 1987 were oflered low interest <br />loans but still had no interest Berg acknowledged O'Sullivan's pride in his property and <br />saw the proposal as an improvement She also saw the need to look at the highest and <br />best use of the property and w as not convinced residential would be the answer. She <br />noted the neighbors were pleased with the proposal at hand <br />Mabusth asked for a reason w hy the property was not suitable for housing. Berg said it <br />was close to an intersection and not large enough to attract a developer <br />Peterson said he thought the neighbors would prefer a buffer such as a church but that was <br />not voiced <br />Lindquist asked about petitions for and against the project. O'Sullivan noted that petitions <br />were presented at both information meetings as w ell as located in his store Of all the <br />signatures, he has only received one in opposition, and that person lives tarther away from <br />the site O'Sullivan said he has heard no opposition Peterson acknowledged the change <br />of heart from those neighboring property ow ners in this application as compared to the <br />previous application for a shelter for this property O'Sullivan also questioned the <br />affordability of land for moderate housing on the site <br />It was noted that the public was not notified of this sketch plan review The next door <br />neighbor to this property, John Erickson, was said to not oppose or voice positively for <br />this proposal. <br />15