My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
08-19-1996 Planning Packet
Orono
>
Planning Commission
>
1996
>
08-19-1996 Planning Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/13/2023 3:12:54 PM
Creation date
9/13/2023 3:07:14 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
287
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION <br />MEETING HELD ON JULY 15. 19% <br />(#9 - #3154 John O’Sullivan/Erwin Smith - Continued) <br />Gaffron said the issue is whether the property should be rezoned from residential to <br />commercial There is B-1 zoning on two sides of the property The northern side is an <br />existing 1/2 acre residential neighborhood On the east side is an outlot containing a <br />wetland area which is a density credit for the Lafayette Ridge neighborhood The site <br />itself consists of 4 tax parcels, portions of which are within the 1000' lakeshore setback. <br />Hardcover regulations allow for 35% coverage over these portions of the property <br />GaRron reported that the Comprehensive Plan calls for the City to encourage private <br />development in the Navarre area but to not adversely affect the neighboring property. <br />Woodland areas are to be maintained also The plan calls for neighboring retail and <br />professional services to be available <br />Gaffron reported that there is pressure on Orono and other cities to provide affordable <br />hou.sing and questioned whether this property might meet such a need In reviewing the <br />property, Gaffron said it could hold three 1/2 acre single family residences With its <br />proximity to the neighboring businesses, other options could be three 2-unit duplexes or <br />M-6 density' housing Gaffron asked that the Commission make their considerations in the <br />scheme of enhancing the Navarre area and in consideration of the area as a w hole A <br />study was begun in 1987 to rev iew the Navarre area Business owners were not interested <br />in pursuing any changes at that time <br />Peterson brought attention to the public information hearings conducted by O'Sullivan on <br />the project. Peterson attended one of the meetings and noted favorable input from those <br />in attendance Peterson noted only one variance appeared to be required for this proposal. <br />However, the issue of lezuiiiug is serious and has rarely been changed in the history of the <br />City. Peterson continued that if such rezoning was done, this is is a logical location but <br />use is a different matter altogether The comments Peterson heard at the meetings favored <br />the rezoning The neighbors were said to view the proposal as a viable option. <br />Stoddard said he atiended both meetings and saw overwhelming support for the proposal. <br />He noted that something needs to happen with the vacated church property adding that <br />the B-5 zoning was a less stringent application As to the housing possibility, Stoddard <br />said he understands the need but noted having a proposal at hand from a local <br />businessman. Stoddard did acknowledee the need for review of a Navarre beautificationw <br />plan or revitalization. Peterson responded that the business owners showed no interest <br />when presented with such an idea. He added that the City would not proceed without that <br />interest from the local businesses
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.