01-16-1996 Planning Packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Zoning File #2100 January 8, 1996 Page 2 Gl-4 - Hardcover Fact Sheet H - Engineer ’s Report 1/5/96 11-3 - Floor Plan Three Levels J - Elevations West and East - North and South elevations have not been submitted with application inlormation Description of Request Applicants propose the removal of all existing improvements and the construction of a nevv residence requiring a lot width variance as property measures 101' at both the OHWL and 75 setback. The code requires a 140' width. The structure will meet all required setbacks of the LR-IB zoning district. Based on the height definition, height shall be determined at the 962 elevation (962’ = highest elevation adjacent to residence, 952.5 + 10’ = 962.5’). At 1 1/2 acres the propertv has adequate area to support all proposed hardcover improvements as portions of the new structure wi'* located both in 75-250 and 250-500 setback areas. The newme new ^uuciuic; wr- ------------ structure will be locatea behind the average lakeshore setback line determined by the residence structures located to the north and south of the proposed residence. The former residence on this property (located closer to shoreline) sustained drainage/flooding problems over the years which former owner claimed were intensified with the new construction to the north. Filling of the building pad will also provide insurance from flooding of the proposed residence and will also provide the desired walkout design. Review Exhibit H, the engineer approves the proposed jading and drainage plan but is concerned that applicant proposes boulder walls where portions of the wall on both the north and south lot lines will exceed a 4' height. Where walls exceed 4’, the engineer asks that modular masomy- block walls be considered and that a structural design be provided for all wall sections over the 4’ height. Review Exhibit F, note the area on north side of the residence just to the east of the garage. Staff would ask why the area could not be filled and grades tie into a swale adjacent to lot line rather than installing a retaining wall and attempting to control drainage from house in the limited area between wall and house. Staff would also like more detail on the drainage along the south side to the east of the retaining wall at the 954’ to 952' elevation. WUl drainage flow onto adjacent property to south? How shall drainage be controlled along lot line to ensure that drainage does not flow to residence at north but is directed further east? Statement of Hardship Refer to Exhibit B. i