My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
02-20-1996 Planning Packet
Orono
>
Planning Commission
>
1996
>
02-20-1996 Planning Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/7/2023 2:47:39 PM
Creation date
9/7/2023 2:42:48 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
217
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Zoning File #2108 <br />Februan' 14. 1996 <br />Page 4 <br />outlot. J-2 shows private roaH outlot with extensions of sewer easement to west. Aci css to <br />Lot 3 is v'ia drive'vav through extrusion outlot and unimproved Garden Lane. Stwer *s <br />provided via 20’ easement along shared lot lines. <br />Planning Commission to provide direction on the following: <br />1.Shall a sewer easement be designated to west lot line to ser\e undeveloped <br />Tonkaview lots to west and north? <br />Should access road be redefined as Garden Lane, a public road, providing <br />access to undeveloped Tonkaview lots or should the roadway remain as a <br />private road with a tuture extension outlot to Garden Lane? <br />3.Kow is north lot or Lot 3 to achieve legal access? WiU it meet criteria set <br />forth in back Jot/front lot ordinance for creation of a back lot in a subdivision <br />or should access b«* provided from unimproved Garden Lane along the west <br />bcundarv via an extension outlet of the private road? <br />a.Street/Fasement. The Engineer's report notes concern with the steepness of the <br />elevations requiring extensive excavation. The individual driveway locations should <br />be located as many of the driveways will be placed within the same steep grades. <br />Plans must include storm sewer. <br />In the orieinal Heaihercroft plat, the subject property was platted with 10' drainage <br />and utihr. cements along all exterior lot lines. The City will ask for a dedication <br />of drai" ^e and utility easements at 5' width along all internal lot lines and 10' along <br />the proposed road right-of-way. The City will ask for drainage easements over all <br />retention areas, drainageways and storm sewers. U is not certain if applicant will be <br />asked to prov ide otT-site storm sewer improvements. During an earlier subdivision <br />review in the late 80's, many neighbors along Wildhurst Trail voiced concern with <br />runoff from development increasing the erosion that was taking place at both the <br />V est and east sides of Wildhurst Trail. Applicant is being asked to retain runoit md <br />reduce velocities of the runoff. The normal standards for treatment and retention <br />mav be intensified if off-site improvement is not to be required. <br />Planning Commission memoers will be asked to address the following issues for applicant in his <br />preparation for tne filing of preliminary subdivision application: <br />1 Should sewer easement be taken to west lot line?
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.