Laserfiche WebLink
Zoning File #2108 <br />February 14, 1996 <br />Page 2 <br />List of Exhibits <br />A - <br />B - <br />C - <br />D - <br />E - <br />F - <br />G - <br />H - <br />I - <br />J - <br />K - <br />Application <br />Location Map <br />Sewer As-Built <br />2' Contour Map from Earlier Subdivision Review <br />City Topographic Map <br />Engineer's Sketch of Proposed Drainage Easement over Lots 2 and 3 <br />Back Lot/Front Lot Ordinance <br />Gustafson Report 2/6/96 <br />Gustafson Sketch of Road Layout (Option B, Page 2, Gustafson Report) <br />Staff Sketch <br />Sketch Plan of Five Lot Subdivision <br />Review of Proposed Plan <br />Access to the subdivision shall be via Wildhurst Trail. The City has reviewed the proposed location <br />of the access and finds no problem with the sighting distance. The private road is shown at a 66 <br />width with 120' diameter. The Code would require only a 50' wide road and 100' diameter cul-de- <br />sac. All lots but Lot 3 have conforming access. Lot 3 is shown as a back lot with a 20' driveway <br />easement extending from cul-de-sac to south lot line of Lot 3. If Lot 3 is tound to meet criteria that <br />would allow a back lot with subdivision, an access corridor must be redefined at a 30' wide outlot <br />and lot area of 3 must be increased to two acres. Setbacks of a back lot are to meet 150% of the <br />resular setbacks for the zoning district; front 52.5' (150%/35') and side 15' (150%/10'). <br />There would be adequate area to meet the back lot area requirements but each lot would be reduced <br />to one acre m area. <br />No matter what final configuration is proposed with the formal subdivision application, applicant's <br />surveyor must complete a 2' topographic plan to determine the location of any bluff impact zones <br />and define a 30' setback from the top of bluff. <br />Review Comments <br />1.Drainage/Grading Plan. Refer to Exhibits D and E, there are two major drainageways within <br />the seven acre parcel. Refer to the north, specifically Lots 3 and 4. There is a major ravine <br />that intersects the property at the north. Refer to Exhibit F, in an earlier subdivision review <br />the Engineer recommended a 50' drainage easement along the southern portion and at the <br />northeit comer to be extended to a 75* width. Per Section 10.55, Subdivision 15 (A) (2), <br />"For properties served by municipal sanitary sewer, the minimum lot area may be divided <br />by Flood Fringe lands provided at least one-half acre of land not within the protected area <br />1