My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
02-20-1996 Planning Packet
Orono
>
Planning Commission
>
1996
>
02-20-1996 Planning Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/7/2023 2:47:39 PM
Creation date
9/7/2023 2:42:48 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
217
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Zoning File #2110 <br />Februar)' 14, 1996 <br />Page 4 <br />1. <br />J. <br />4. <br />5. <br />6. <br />7. <br />The home was built prior to the Shoreland Regulations approved by the City in 1992. <br />The structure was built in 1983/1984. <br />The original residence structure conformed to all pertinent Shoreland Regulations at <br />that time. <br />The entire residence structure is located within the 75-1 5vT setback area where no <br />structural hardcover is allowed. The entire structure is non-conforming. <br />Based on the peninsular shape of the Dayton propertv' and as a result of the new <br />Shoreland Regulations that redefined what was once a wetland to a Natural <br />Environment lake, the majority of diy buildable area is unbuildable. <br />The improvements will not result in new structural hardcover as all additions or <br />expansions will be placed over existing structure or deck. <br />The applicants cannot expand upon their residence without obtaining a variance as <br />a result of the new Shoreland Regulations. <br />The property is unique based on the irregular or peninsular shape and for the fact that <br />a recent ordinance amendment reclassified 6,444 s.f. of residence structure non- <br />conforming requiring special consideration. <br />Issues for Consideration <br />1. <br />3. <br />How shall the City and applicant resolve issue of detached garage constructed without a <br />building permit that encroaches within Lot 3? Applicant may apply for the legal <br />combination of Lots 2 and 3 or consider a .subdivision of a lot line rearrangement. Once the <br />land use matter is resolved, applicant should obtain an after-the-fact building permit. <br />How shall applicant's property be recognized ... as Lot 2 or combined Lots 1 and 2 or <br />combined Lots 1, 2 and 3? Applicant's hardcover facts should be amended to include the <br />more generous 75-250' setback area along north shore line and to decide what lots shall make <br />up the homestead parcel. <br />If applicant chooses to maintain Lot 2 as single homestead, should additional hardcover <br />improvements be removed within the 75-250' setback area where a 4.1% excess exists. <br />4. Other issues raised by Planning Commission. <br />Options of Action <br />To either deny, approve or amend the current proposal <br />Isv
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.