My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
02-20-1996 Planning Packet
Orono
>
Planning Commission
>
1996
>
02-20-1996 Planning Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/7/2023 2:47:39 PM
Creation date
9/7/2023 2:42:48 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
217
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Zoning File #2110 <br />February 14,1996 <br />Page 3 <br />Review of Application <br />ces and technically hardcover variances for <br />nd 150' setback area of French Lake, South <br />:e in 1983, the 75' setback from French Lake <br />Applicant seeks approval of lakeshore setback <br />structural additions to be installed between the <br />Basin. At the time of the construction of the res <br />was the required setback. Note the entire structure is located within the 75-150' setback area <br />resulting in approximately 6,444 s.f. ot non-contorming structural hardcover. The proposed <br />improvement will result in structural additions of 346 s.f placed over an existing deck, review <br />Exhibits K and P. <br />As entire structure is located within the 75-150' setback area, any addition proposed for this <br />residence would require both setback and hardcover approvals. Please note all non-structural <br />improvements, such as grade-level patios, landscaping with plastic, paving for roadway, etc., would <br />be allowed in the 75-150' setback area. <br />Once again review Exhibit K and now Q. Applicant's sur\ eyor originally designated 150' setback <br />from the north shoreline of the North Basin of French Lake. Members may remember the <br />amendment that reclassified French Lake North Basin to a wetland now requiring only a 26' setback <br />from the 930.5 elevation. Applicant's hardcover and legal building envelopes should be redefined. <br />Note applicant's hardcover facts reveal that the area of both Lots 1, 2 and 3 have been considered. <br />The properties are not legally combined. It is not clear what applicant's intention is for the use of <br />the property in the future. Note that there is 29.1% hardcover in the 75-250' zone if Lot 2 or <br />applicant's homestead parcel is only considered. A 4.1% excess of hardco\er e.xists in the 75-150 <br />setback area of Lot 2. <br />Review Exhibits K and N, the City has no record of issuing a permit for the detached garage that <br />encroaches within both Lots 2 and *3. Applicant's architect advised that he determined the structure <br />was probably built soon after the residence in 1983. <br />Note the slight encroachment of the existing residence and portions of deck. In 1983 and 1986. the <br />75' setback would have been determined from the actual water level of the South Basin as the <br />OHWL was not established at that lime. There is approximately 37.5 s.f of principal structure and <br />40 s. f of the lakeside deck within the 0-75’ setback area. <br />The additions will have no impact on adjacent residences but will provide applicant with expansion <br />room for the family room and dining area. The additions will not extend beyond the existing three <br />season porch lakeside addition. <br />Review of Hardships <br />Please refer to E.xhibit B. The hardships are reviewed as follows;
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.