My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
04-15-1996 Planning Packet
Orono
>
Planning Commission
>
1996
>
04-15-1996 Planning Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/7/2023 2:48:16 PM
Creation date
9/7/2023 2:42:11 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
283
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
r <br />Zoning File Wl\11 <br />April 10, 1996 <br />Page 3 <br />Parcel B = 100' front/100’ rear <br />Side setback required <br />Parcel A <br />West = 70' <br />East =110' <br />15’ <br />Parcel B <br />West = 30’ <br />East = 190’ <br />TTk properties are located within the Metropolitan Urban Sen -- Area and shall be developed wi* <br />on-sitc septic system. Review Exhibit H, Weekman reports sepuc testing confirms each lot can be <br />developed with five bedroom residence. The system will be pressurized moun^ and located on <br />Slones at 6% or less. Review Exhibits E1& 2, applicant proposes development of a dn veway over <br />a 2? wide road and utility casement over Lot 2. West Branch Hill, to gain access to the property. <br />Parcel B or Lot 96 will be served by a 25' easement that runs eastward along the north lot line ot <br />Parcel A to the west lot line of B. <br />Review of Application <br />Sewer vs. Septic <br />The property is located within the Metropolitan Urban Service Area. Sewer is over 2,000 <br />Tonkaview Road. Review Exhibit J, with the Norbert Johnson subdivision, scwct will be <br />aoproximately 1,600 ’. Applicant proposes development of the property with on-site septic. <br />wLkman has approved the septic. As sewer is not immediately available to this pro^rty, !.*ie City <br />shall approve the development of the property as proposed subject to the condition that once sewer <br />is extended in this area, the properties shall be included within the sewer project Given the <br />topography and the proposed house location, this may prove to be an expensive component of ftiture <br />sewer project. <br />Review Exhibits SI and S2, Gatfron is concerned that future septic sites may be destroyed on Lot <br />2, West Branch Hill, if the 25; easement is develop -‘o2, westbrancnniii, uuiea:^ caj^uicuioviwvv.vri^-..--------------- <br />need to provide current septic testing as old septic test information is no longer valid. Review <br />Exhibit Q, Van Sloun’s septic is located to the west of the lot. <br />Use of Easements for Access <br />Review Exhibits B, M and P, note that the County has designated the 25’ of underlying road and <br />X e gr»re “ ,o ie City in Ute plats of West Branch Hill and West Branch Acres as <br />‘■ J <br />1 <br />J
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.