04-15-1996 Planning Packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Zoning File #2128 April 12, 1996 Page 5 move the structure as far north as possible to stay away from the bad soils area so as not to increase construction costs. Utilities/Easement Refer to Exhibits F and H, waste water shall be pumped from a grinder pumping station through a force main to the existing gravity sewer line within Old Crystal Bay Road. Gustafson notes the pumping station should be located near the driveway for future maintenance purposes. Upon application for a building permit, applicant shall prepare construction plans and specifications for the pumping station, force main and water main with as-built plans provided to the City upon completion. The City shall take easements over all lines located within Old Crystal Bay Road right- of-way. Note 33' of Old Crystal Bay Road has not been dedicated to the public, fhc City will ask for easements over the detention pond and storm sewers. The Type I wetland should be protected via private covenants to be filed on the chain of title. It is possible that the conditional use permit resolution that wall include an attachment of the site plan locating the wetlands can guarantee the same degree of protection. Refer to Exhibit H, Gustafson's report of January 5, 199i, specifically page 2, third paragraph, the engineer asks for drainage and utility easements along the perimeters of the property as we are not dealing with a subdivision, the applicable code for this review would not require the granting of easements with a conditional use permit review. We don't see a reason for asking the County to review this plan as we are proposing no alteration within the County right-of-way nor does this applicant propose access on to the County Road nor would the City encourage direct access on to the County Road. MUSA Amendment/Sewcr Capacity Members are aware that the City has filed a Comp Plan Amendment dealing w'ith the realignment and expansion of the Metropolitan Urban Service Area within the City for not only ten specific neighborhoods but also the School property. The Metropolitan Council has asked for an extension of the review time and we will probably not hear from the Council until the end of May. Ron Moorse has met with Carl Schenk of the Met Council on April 12, 1996 and advised that Mr. Schenk felt that the School property could be reviewed separately and possibly placed on a consent agenda at an upcoming meeting. He will be checking with other members of staff of the Met Council to determine if an "amendment of the original amendment can be expedited for the School. The applicant had been advised by the City that a building permit could not be issued until Met Council had approved the plan amendment. Another major obstacle is the issue of sewer capacity. It is not clear whether Orono has additional capacity in the existing lines down stream. It may be necessary to complete certain improvements for increased capacity for the City. Both Orono and the City of Long Lake are in the process of