My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
05-20-1996 Planning Packet
Orono
>
Planning Commission
>
1996
>
05-20-1996 Planning Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/7/2023 2:45:57 PM
Creation date
9/7/2023 2:41:48 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
197
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
ClTYofORONO <br />Municipal Offices <br />Street Address: <br />2750 Kelley Parkway <br />Orono. MN 55356 <br />Mailing Address: <br />P.O. Box 66 <br />Crystal Bay. MN SS323 0066 <br />Dick Putnam <br />2765 Casco Point Road <br />Wayzata, MN 55391 <br />RE: Deck Reconstruction <br />Dear Mr. Putnam: <br />This letter is intended as a review of the 1987 variance approval for additions to your residence, as <br />well as to provide you a format statement regarding Orono's hardcover and structure replacement <br />policies. <br />I received your fa.x including copies of Resolution No. 2254 (which is the correct resolution) and its <br />exhibits. 1 also reviewed our variance and permit files, which lead me to a number of conclusions <br />regarding what was approved: <br />The Council approved the proposed screen porch/patio/deck configuration and its <br />associated hardcover as showu in Exhibit D of the resolution. It is unclear from the <br />file whether Council had seen the "octagonal ’’ version of the deck plans, which <br />version was submitted for tlie building pemiit but which was not built. Also, it might <br />be concluded from either version that some expansion of the existing deck was <br />proposed. The resolution wording could be construed as assuming the deck might <br />be rebuilt. (Ultimately, we view this as inconsequential, because the variance and <br />permit expired long before the existing deck was finally replaced). <br />The porch/deck plans submitted for the building permit showed an octagonal <br />configuration, apparently proposing to slightly .evis- the fcotprint of the existing <br />deck and add a stairway at llie south end. Those plans were approved by Tom Jacobs <br />on 8/23/88, and permit #1140 for "deck extension/screen porch addition" was issued <br />on 8/31/88. I don’t know why we approved a deck plan different from what was <br />approved in the resolution e.xhibit. <br />Telephone (612) 47M357 • FAX 4734)510 <br />i
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.