My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
11-17-1997 Planning Packet
Orono
>
Planning Commission
>
1997
>
11-17-1997 Planning Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/6/2023 10:52:55 AM
Creation date
9/6/2023 10:48:41 AM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
207
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
! ' <br />Navarre Housing Study <br />The foundations on residences were evaluated. Almost all foundations were in fair to <br />excellent condition. This was especially true in Area III where all foundations were in <br />good to excellent condiuon. The number in poor to dilapidated condition was very small. <br />Table 2.7 <br />Tondition nf Windowfs on Residences <br />excellent goodWindows fair poor dilapidated <br />Areal <br />Area II <br />Area III <br />Area IV <br />29(38%) 32(42%) 14(18%) 1(1%) <br />21 (29%) 37(31%) 8(11%) 2 (3%) <br />14(56%) 10(40%) n/a n/a <br />18 (24%) 43 (57%) 11(15%) 2(3%) <br />Total 82(33%) 122(49%) 33(13%) 5(2%) <br />n/a <br />2 (3%) <br />n/a <br />n/a <br />2 (1%) <br />The condition of windows were evaluated. Windows were in good to excellent condition <br />overall. There were a few structures that have older window frames and were <br />experiencing minor rotting or weathering. Many of the traditional wood frame windows <br />in the neighborhood have been replaced by vinyl or aluminum. <br />Table 2.8 <br />Windows that were broken or having screens missing were noted. As the previous <br />question states, most windows were in relatively good condition. <br />Table 2.9 <br />Overall Appearance of Houses <br />Overall Appearance excellent good fair poor <br />Areal <br />Area II <br />Area III <br />Area IV <br />14(18%) <br />12 (17%) <br />12 (48%) <br />5 (7%) <br />44 (58%) <br />34 (47%) <br />12 (48%) <br />47 (63%) <br />15 (20%) <br />18 (25%) <br />n/a <br />18(24%) <br />3 (4%) <br />5 (7%) <br />n/a <br />3 (4%) <br />dilapidated <br />n/a <br />Total 43(17%) 137(55%) 51(21%) 11(4%) <br />1 (1%) <br />n/a <br />1 (1%) <br />2 (1%) <br />The overall condition of houses were documented. Most houses were in fair to <br />excellentcondition overall. Few residences were in poor to dilapidated condition. <br />Number of Windows Broken or Havinc Screens Missing on Residences <br />•broken screens missing <br />Area I 1 (1%)n/a 1 <br />Area II 1 (1%)2 (3%) <br />Area III n/a n/a <br />Area IV 1 (1%)n/a <br />Total 3 (1%)2 (1%) <br />J
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.