My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
10-20-1997 Planning Packet
Orono
>
Planning Commission
>
1997
>
10-20-1997 Planning Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/6/2023 11:27:33 AM
Creation date
9/6/2023 10:25:43 AM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
452
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
r <br />10 20 97 17:52 0612 •3')7 56<ii DSU. INC ©uO-l 005 <br />30 to 50 mature oaks/maples and acres of young high quality mixed woods with <br />numerous young oaks, maples* and basswood. <br />2. On projects with tree removal such as this. I suggest that an even higher landscape <br />investment may be needed to begin to mitigate the impacts. Such projects gentrally <br />require a more substantial investment In landscaping to adequately address the <br />functional, screening and aesthetic impacts of the extensive tree removal. <br />3. I recommend that a landscape plan be prepared by a registered landscape architect. This <br />plan should emphasize supplementing and restoring the natural characteristics of the <br />existing woodlands* and providing an effective vegetative buffer along residential and <br />public frontages. It should also include the selective placement of trees along the fronts <br />of the town homes to interrupt the long expanses of building facade, paving and <br />parking. The walk layout between units could easily be modified to accommodate a <br />single large tree or group of trees to serve this purpose. <br />Trail Connection; <br />1. It may be desirable to provide a pedestrian/bike trail to the south to connect to County <br />Road 15. The most readily developed trail corridor would be in the area west of the <br />large wetland system. If the such a trail would fit into the Community's trail objectives <br />City* the developer should explore developing an 8-feet wide bituminous trail In that <br />area. The storm ponding should be designed to serve as an amenity feature and to <br />incorporate a winding trail connection and landscaping. <br />.Itink. Trash. Old Foundation <br />1. While inspecting the site, it was apparent that illegal dumping has occurred on the <br />property for some time. The site also has at least one demolished structure, slab and <br />foundation. Most of the dumped materials appear to be household furnishings, trash* <br />and junk dumped around the site of the footings and into the wetlands. Prior to <br />development, the developer should hire a qualified consultant to conduct a preliminary <br />environmental audit to determine the apparent nature and extent of this dumping and to <br />evaluate the need for edditional environmental review, and to determine that all known <br />wells have been properly abandoned. <br />pprlaration of Restrictive Covenants <br />1. If this project is approved, the developer should prepare a Declaration of Restrictive <br />Covenants that provides adequate aesthetic and operational constraints for the <br />development. These covenants should restrict removal of additional trees or woods. <br />The covenants should also prohibit outdoor and recreational vehicle storage, and limit <br />the number and size of vehicles parked in drives in an ongoing basis. <br />Tree preservation/Mitigation <br />1. The City currently doe not have a tree preservation or replacement ordinance. The City <br />should review their comprehensive plan goals, objectives and policies, and address the
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.