My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
09-15-1997 Planning Packet
Orono
>
Agendas, Minutes & Packets
>
Planning Commission
>
Packets
>
1990-1999
>
1997
>
09-15-1997 Planning Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/6/2023 10:10:36 AM
Creation date
9/6/2023 10:01:59 AM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
476
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Zoning File #2286 <br />September 11,1997 <br />Page 3 <br />pertinent ordinances. Parcel B is likely a lakeshore lot; however, the lack of a 929.4’ contour line <br />on the survey makes this difficult to confirm. Note that the e.xisting detached garage on Parcel B was <br />approved on the basis that the entire 55-acre parcel abutted the shoreline. If the proposed dividing <br />line makes Parcel B no longer abut the lakeshore, then the detached garage on Parcel B will become <br />non-conforming. Applicant should have the 929.4’ contour confirmed prior to final Council action. <br />Existing Buildings on Parcel A <br />Applicant has advised staff that the bam and other out buildings located in the northwest comer of <br />Parcel A south of Bayside Road will be removed. Anplicant proposes to construct a new home on <br />Parcel A in the near future. <br />Site Evaluation Completed <br />Applicant has provided information confirming that primaiy' and alternate drainfield sites are <br />available in Parcel A for construction of a new residence. <br />Issues for Discussion <br />1. How soon should the e.xisting farm buildings be removed from Parcel A? Note that the bam <br />is about 2,000 s.f., and the other buildings are each less than 1,000 s.f All are in poor <br />condition, and applicant has indicated he will remove them. <br />2. The applicant should be required to grant Conservation and Flowage Easements over the <br />major wetland at the south end of the property, and over the smaller wetland north of <br />Bayside Road in Parcel B. <br />3. The applicant should be required to formally grant to Hennepin County a road easement over <br />the 66’ Bayside Road segment traversing the property, which has never been formally platted <br />Orono ’s Comprehensive Plan indicates Bayside is a 'collector' road with a required width of <br />66'. Hennepin County staff have been asked to comment on this. <br />4. Are there any other issues for discussion identified by Planning Commission? <br />Staff Recommendation <br />Staff recommends approval of the proposed metes and bounds Class I subdivision with the following <br />conditions of approval: <br />1.Move the lot line so that the portion of Parcel A north of Bayside Road is at least 5 acres dry <br />buildable.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.