My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
09-15-1997 Planning Packet
Orono
>
Planning Commission
>
1997
>
09-15-1997 Planning Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/6/2023 10:10:36 AM
Creation date
9/6/2023 10:01:59 AM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
476
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Zoning File #2293 <br />September 11, 1997 <br />Page 6 <br />remainder of proposed sewer lines will be within the public road right-of-way to be <br />dedicated. Applicant will need to deal with the utility companies regarding the necessary <br />casements for existing lines, or move those lines to locations not needing special additional <br />easements. <br />Staff recommends approval of the proposed vacations in conjunction with this subdivision <br />if it is approved, subject to review and comment by the DNR. <br />IV. Merits of Subdivision <br />1 he proposed subdivision includes 14 lots as follows: <br />Twelve 1 -acre density lots abutting a proposed public road. <br />- Two 2-acre density lots served by an easement (not outlot) driveway. <br />The 2 acre lots are located in what is currently a 1 acre zone, and these 2 acre <br />lots are proposed to be served by septic systems, for which site evaluation <br />reports have been submitted (see diagram on sheet 4 of 5). <br />The subdivision also includes 2 outlots as tollows: <br />Outlot A is 1.5 acres in area, abutting Highview Lane north of the DNR- <br />interest park property. <br />Outlot B is the Van Sloun 4.8 acre lot abutting Highview Lane north of the <br />tax forfeit Cit>’ park property. <br />Applicant has not confirmed his intent for Outlots A and B. Note that for park dedication <br />purposes. 8% of 26.4 acres = 2.1 acres. The Park Commission has not reviewed the current <br />proposal and has not made a recommendation os to whether the City should require land <br />dedication or a park fee. <br />The following are some general comments, concerns and issues regarding the proposed <br />subdivision: <br />1. <br />J. <br />Both proposed cul-de-sacs are intended to be public roads. Applicant notes that they <br />extend no further north or west than the existing Wildhurst Trail cul-de-sac extends <br />eastward. In the sketch plan review', it was noted that Wildhurst Trail is already <br />excessive in length (approximately 2200' from the e.xisting cul-de-sac to County <br />Road 19 with no secondary access). <br />The current proposal does not include a connecting route betw'een Wildhurst and <br />West Branch Road, or to any other potential secondary access. <br />Outlot A is situated where it would be an added buffer to the DNR interest portion
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.