09-15-1997 Planning Packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Zoning File #2293 September 11,1997 Page 5 \ B.FinH that the applicant's proposal has so many compelling characteristics that expansion of the urban area for this development will be a positive move, enhancing all the characteristics the City is intending to preserve by its current policy; i.e. find that it meets the intent of the Comprehensive Plan's goals and policies, if not the ler :t. Alternative A in staffs opinion is a more appropriate method than Alternative B, because Alternative A establishes parameters for change, rather than appearing to single out this individual property for change. Alternative A would avoid setting a precedent, where Alternative B may open the door to developer requests. Under Alternative A it would take some time for the Ciw to develop appropriate criteria for change. Under Alternate B. the City might act more quickly on this individual application. Developer requests for MUSA and Comp Plan amendments to accommodate new development in Orono are rare. The last one was Sugar Woods nearly 10 years ago. as noted during the sketch plan review, that had a unique set of circumstances related to proximity to an adjacent city, annexation threats, etc. In order for the developer to proceed with this subdivision, the Planning Commission and Council must tlrst conclude that the Comprehensive Plan and MUSA boundaiy amendment is appopriate, as well as the rezoning. The applicant has submitted a proposal and will make a presentation Monday night in support of his proposed amendments. 111. Right-of-Way Vacation Applicant proposes to vacate the system of undeveloped roads and alleyways within tlie plat of "Mount Home Park", which vas dedicated when the plat was filed in May 1895. These roads and alleys have never been opened by the City. Area utility- companies have been notified and their input requested regarding the vacation. No responses have been received as of this writing. A portion of the right-of-way to be vacated could conceivably provide public access to Lake Minnetonka, depending on the actual location of the 929.4 contour which is no ‘ shown on the preliminary plat drav\ings. Staff has requested DNR input on this vacation request, since the City's e.xperience in the past has been that the DNR commonly opposes vacations ot right-of-way that provide public lake access. Xpplicant ’s submitted plans indicate that there are overhead power lines in the westerly portion of right-of-way to be vacated, as well as a municipal sewer line. Plans show that drainage and utility easements will be granted for the existing sewer line within Lot 1. The