My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
06-16-1997 Planning Packet
Orono
>
Planning Commission
>
1997
>
06-16-1997 Planning Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/6/2023 8:47:18 AM
Creation date
9/6/2023 8:40:23 AM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
361
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
minutes of the regular orono crry council <br />MEETING HELD ON OCTOBER 9,1995 <br />(#4 - #2049 Chic Dwight/Fred Guttorrason - Continued) <br />Jabbour inquired what the applicant would be allowed to repair on the deck if the <br />reconunendation was not approved, noting that the current railing does not mc^ ^ , <br />Gafifron said boards could be replaced without a variance. The quesoon is at what level <br />of replacement a variance is needed. If a deck is totally removed, it would require a <br />variance to rebuild it. The City would likely approve a variance required to maintain the <br />safety of an e.xisting deck. <br />Jabbour asked if the change from a window to a walkout d(^r requires a variance. <br />Gaffion said the variance, as well as a conditional use permit, is required because of the <br />excavation <br />Hurr said she was concerned with the deck ’s encroachment on the lakeshorc. Th« <br />appUcant noted that if the deck was asked to be removed, he would not proceed with the <br />other proposed projeas. Hurr said, even if the appUcant would not proceed with the <br />other improvements, she could not support the lakeshore deck remairung. urr <br />suppon of the other recommended projeas; though, she did voice some concern of th <br />excavation. <br />Goenen said she was also concerned with setting a precedent by aUotmg eacavalion for <br />a walkout and would not support it. She emphasized the majority of the home being <br />within the 0-75' zone. Goenen said she would suppon the seteened porch and deck but <br />not the deck at the lakeside. <br />removal and 99?'. of w hat the City would like removed. Jabbour said he would not <br />support the boulder walls unless they were to stabibze the ground. He did support the <br />w^out. <br />in 1975 He was not aware if the deck was there at that time nor whether its value had <br />been estabUshed. The applicant said the house w^ built in 1970. I ^ey ^ed if a <br />gradi^plan had been presented at that time. Gaiiron said probably not. The applicant <br />said he has the original plans. <br />.1
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.