My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
06-16-1997 Planning Packet
Orono
>
Planning Commission
>
1997
>
06-16-1997 Planning Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/6/2023 8:47:18 AM
Creation date
9/6/2023 8:40:23 AM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
361
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF TIIF. REGULAR ORONO CITY COUNCIL <br />MEETING HELD ON OCTOBER 9,1995 <br />(#4 • #2049 Chic Dwight/Fred Guttorrason - Continued) <br />Gaffron said Stafif does not totally agree wth the recommendation of the Planmng <br />Commission as it is felt the new screen porch located so near the shore^e would only <br />increase the bulk structure of the property within 75' of the shore. Staff is also concern <br />that the approval of the excavation to create a walkout would possioly be precedent <br />setting. <br />view. It is his roain concern that this lakeshore deck remain. <br />willing to eUminate the gravel road, had no problem with changing the sttirs from <br />front fo the back of the deck, would remove the small s^d, <br />and noted that the lO'xlO' shed had already been removed as weU as the centw s^io <br />the driveway, which was sodded. He is willing to proceed with the recomme^auons if <br />the lakeshore deck can remain. The applicant said it was then intention “ <br />upkeep on the property. The rip rap has been found to be erodmg and needs to be <br />reconstructed in order to save trees. <br />Chic Dwight commented that neighbors present at the Plannmg Commission me^g <br />were not Sren the opportunity to comment on the application. She said .hey were in <br />favor of the proposed projects. Goetten responded that she also w« present« <br />meeting and felt their inability to speak was unintentional, an oversight, and apologized <br />for the applicant's feeling ot mistreatment. <br />rsalsaifsf: <br />cSf He noted that the area was more than likely filled in when the house was built and is <br />not in its natural state but was probably flat and buUt up to accommodate the spht-entry <br />Style home. <br />The aooUcant said the area where they are asking for excavation for the tv^out is on the <br />2lt end and receives very little Ught. Their purpose is to gain more Ught into the lower <br />level of the home with the walkout door. <br />KeUey asked and received confirmation that there is an entrance to the inside of the <br />residence from the screened porch. <br />KeUev asked if there were any hardships for the requested variances. The <br />their^esire was to improve on the aesthetics of the home, to gain the e.«ra hght into the <br />lower level, and to repair the deck. <br />i
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.