Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION <br />MEETING HELD ON MAY 19. 1997 <br />(#2 - Telecommunications Ordinance - Continued) <br />Schroeder informed her that this was not necessarily true. He said he felt the water towers <br />would be adequate for antennas for the time being. He also indicated other communities <br />could provide the service. <br />McMillan asked if any assessment lias been ntade of the water towers. Van Zomeren <br />indicated that while no analysis has been made, the consultant was aware of the height and <br />location of the water antennas. Gappa said the consultant based his use recommendation <br />on data indicating the four mile distance separation between the water towers and on areas <br />of heavy telecommunication usage and high topography. Gappa said, while the structures <br />were not personally reviewed, there was no reason to believe antennas would not operate <br />from these locations. McMillan noted that the City, which is primarily residential, is <br />concerned with the proper placement of antennas. <br />Steve Mangold, US West Wireless. 426 North Purview, St. Paul, said his company has a <br />central oflBce located south of the water tower by City OflBces. A switch has been located <br />there since the 1950’s, which will provide for PCS services to Orono, Wayzata, Long <br />Lake, and Spring Park. This switching station is an extension of their business and <br />servi^, and Mangold was of the opinion that the location for providing such service <br />should be from this cemral office of US West. Mangold iridicated that all ^Is come <br />through this switch regardless of the company. He said it is a secure location with ^ <br />adequate protection from major calamities. Mangold said he would like to work with the <br />City. He would like to see a co-location pole on the switch station for overflow. He <br />indicated his company does not anticipate further growth until later in the year. <br />Van Zomeren inquired of Mangold how tall the tower would be required. Mangold said <br />90-120* depending on co-location. He indicated that drive tests have not been completed. <br />McMillan inquired what »he zoning was for the switch station. Gaffron indicated B-1 <br />Ron Gunderson, Sprint, said he is in favor of the ordinance with the caveat that the City <br />would be willing to enter into further discussion in the future. He feh the ordinance would <br />not provide for all carriers. He noted other communities which he has worked with <br />regarding this issue and where antennas are allowed. He indicated that Sprint will be <br />requesting location on the City Offices water tower. <br />Smith noted that the industry is in the current stage of locating towers for ant^as. Van <br />Zomeren said the FCC has auctioned off licensesj A and B licenses were sold in the early <br />1990's and C, D, and E licenses were recently made available. She noted it would be a <br />violation of the anti-trust law to master plan locations and grid the City for best locations, <br />co-location may occur on a site-by-site ba^s but companies may not work together. <br />i