06-16-1997 Planning Packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Tos Planning CoDnmlssion Chairman Kelley Orono Planning Commission Members City Administrator Bernhardson X-3 From: Michael P. Gaffron, Asst Planning & Zoning Administrator Dates February 14, 1991 Subject: #1619 Mark & Tracy Whitehead, 1220 Lyman Avenue - Preliminary Subdivision - Public Rearing Zoning District - RR-IB, Single family rural residential unsewered, 2 acre minimum* Application - Pour lot subdivision to create three additional building sites. List of Exhibits Exhibit A - Exhibit B - Exhibit C - Exhibit D - Exhibit E - Exhibit F - Exhibit G - Exhibit H “ Application Plat Map Property Owners List Proposed Plat Drawings Staff Sketch Plan Memo 1/16/91 Notice of Planning Commission Action 1/25/91 Selected Comprehensive Plan & Subdivision Code Sections Staff Sketches - Road Options/Septic Layout/ Steep Slopes Pertinent Facts *> 1. Proposed lot area data is as follows: Dry Wetland Total Lot 1 2.0 ac 1.9 ac 3.9 ac Lot 2 2.0 0.3 2.3 Lot 3 (w/house) 2.3 0.3 2.6 Lot 4 2.0 —2.0 Outlot A 0.22 -0.22 Outlot B 0.33 —0.33 8.85 ac.2.5 ac.11.35 ac 2.At the sketch plan review, it was the clear intent of the Planning Commission that Lyman Avenue be upgraded as part of this subdivision, because this development will Increase traffic on an already substandard roadway. Code Section 11.32, Subdivision 1 requires that the subdivider at his expense improve the public and private roadway to a standard acceptable to the City. However, the issue as to how far east this developer should be responsible for, is not defined because the developer does not own the property where his driveway accesses the existing private easement road. The question is, if the City requires this developer to provide a cul-de-sac (which is definitely needed for maintenance purposes) should it be dedicated from within this plat, or from neighboring properties to the east? i