Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO Cm' COUNCIL <br />MEETING HELD ON SEFTEMB t t <br />JUfX A Ay <br />^#10 - =2057 James Nvstrom - Continued) % ^ <br />Frazee said the home was designed as an understated cottage with an upper master <br />bedroom and bath. With the narrov-Tiess of the lot, the applicant wanted a low prohle. <br />the house were to be made narrower, it would require a second stor>' design. Frazee sai <br />this would not be in keeping with the neighborhood. Hurr voiced concern with the house <br />heiaht changing in the tlirure if this proposal were approved. <br />Hurr said she was concerned with the drip line from the proposed residence. The co e <br />requires a 10' seoaration with a nadmum allowed 1-1/2’ encroachment ot an overhang in <br />the 10' setback. The proposed residence shows a 9.5' setback and 2.2’ overhang, which <br />would bring the roof drip line closet to the side setback line. <br />It was noted that the neighbor's home to the south sits on the lot line as well as the <br />saraee. It was said that a new home would be anticipated in the future on the lot to the <br />north. <br />KeUey said he agreed with the need to meet the side setback and maintain the house out <br />of the 0-75 ’ zone. Kelley said this w ould require the house to be T narrower on each side <br />with the overhang. <br />Hurr said this design requires more land than the lot provides. Frazee said the owner <br />took steps to make improvements on the .ot by proposing a new . ouse. Hurr noted the <br />old residence "on average" met the 10* side setback. Callahan questioned this conclusion, <br />opining that it was better to move farther in than 1.6' as presently located on one side. <br />Hurr said it was her opinion that the side setback should be met as well as no exceeding <br />of the 1-1/2’ overhang allow able. Callahan noted that the house was moved out of the 0- <br />75' zone. <br />Gafiron asked if the footprint to the house were to change, if the Council would like to <br />see the nopUcation again. It was determined if the design met codes, met the side <br />setbacks, met the 30' hardcover requirement, and was out ot the 0-75' zone, the Council <br />would approve the application. <br />Hurr moved, Kelley seconded, to approve Resolution ^3602 with amendments as noted. <br />Ayes 3, Nays 0. <br />(^11) #2033 DONALD & ARLENE KBELLEY, 1670 SHAD WOOD ROAD - <br />VARLA 'fCES - RESOLUTION #3603 <br />Mr. Kielley and contractor, Jerry Roelofs. were present. <br />8