10-28-1996 Council Packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

MINUTES OF THE REGUT-\R ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING HELD ON SEPTEMBER 11,1995 CitO . ;*2051 Michael Hiibelink/John Vogt - Continued) M-^h-sth said there is an issue of m*o drain outlets on the east side of the property by the Peterman Addition and direaed along the lot line to Old Crystal Lay Road. The outlets serve no function and can be closed according to the Engineer. The access for three lots %viU be sen-ed by private road, vv-ith lot 4 to the south by e.'dsting curb cut that sen ed the original house, it was noted that if a new road were put in on the east side, it would create 4 thru lots in the Peterman addition and j thru lots in i e current proposal wnth a lot surrounded on three sides by a road. It was determined to e best served by an internal road, one reason of which to move around the forested area. Hurr asked about two a.'-emate septic sites shown in a stand of trees. Hilbelink said a secondarv. site was m the stand of trees with the principal, halt m and half out. He noted that if a road were to be located to the east, it would be difficult to find two alternate septic sites. Hurr asked about the 10’ and 15’ easements. The first 200’ would be adjacent to the road, according to Cook, due to the wetlands on the propert>’ The 15' w’ould be r^JJ^^ed to stay out of the tree line. It was noted that the easements were already granted for the traU. The trail wiU be built this month. The value of the acreage would be deducted against the 8% park dedication. Hurr moved, Kelley seconded, to approve Resolutif n r?3601. Ayes j. Nays 0. (#10) #2057 JAMES NYSTR* l I, 1745 CONCORDIA STREET - VARIANCES - resolution #5602 The applicant was represented by architect, Greg Frazee. Gaffron noted that the aopUcation is for a number of variances. The original proposal was for an addition located 23’ from the lake. The Planrdng Commission was not m favur of the addition. An amended proposal was presented for a new house located at the 75 setback line with a 10’ deck encroaching the 0-75' zone. The proposed new garage was oroposed at a central location, which would meet setback requirements. Hardcover was proposed at 10.1% in the 0-75’ zone. 31% in the 75-250’ zone, and at 60«/o in the 250- 500’ zone. The Planning Commission saw no justification in encroaching the 0-75 zone with a deck and asked for the house and deck to be moved back out of the zone. The side setback was to change fi-om 10’ to 9.6 ’. It was noted by the appUcant’s architect that anv change in the house width would adversely affect the room sizes. Gafifi'on reported the present proposal shows the house out of the 0-75' zone with hardcover at 35% in the 75-250’ zone and at 60% in the 250-500' zone. A new reconfiguration of the driveway eliminates a large portion of blacktop. Hurr said she saw no hardship for a side setback variance.