My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
10-28-1996 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
1996
>
10-28-1996 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/5/2023 1:30:43 PM
Creation date
9/5/2023 1:26:08 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
505
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINL^TES OF THE ORONO PLAIsTsIING COMMI<^<?ION <br />MEETING HELD ON MAY 20, 1996 <br />Piiiii Slid Sue Hedluiid - Coiiliiiucu) <br />The hardcover in the 0-75 ’ setback exists at 1200 s f and 900 s f in the 75-250’ zone <br />The proposal would increa«;e these calculation? by R5 ? f in the 0-75 ’ and to 17S5 s f in <br />the 75-250’ zone The overall allowed hardcover of 25<>'„ i? 2724 s f and is proposed at <br />3063 s f, an Increase of approximately 300 s f over the allowable. <br />Gaffron continued that this is also a bluff situation The addition to the bulk of the <br />structure would have an im.pact. Grading would also be required withjn the bluff im.pact <br />zone for the drivew ay, Gaffion said the bluff impact is minor, however, w hen compared <br />to other issues involved <br />A main concern is with the septic system for the property. The current septic system is <br />non-conforming and requires replacement, for wliicli a site exists. There is, however, no <br />available alternate site on the propeny for the proposed 3-bedroom house. The <br />neighborhood is proposed for sewering but thJs is an upjesolved issue. Gaffron <br />questioned whether the house should be expanded to 3 bedrooms without an alternate site <br />or withhold Ena! approval until the sewer issue is determined. <br />Applicant, Paul Hedlund, said the property was very unusual. It is their intent to keep the <br />home intact and build onto it as opposed to tearing it down and starting over with new <br />construction. <br />Peterson commented on the large number of variances for the application. He noted that, <br />although the property deserx'es to have a hom.e on it. the applicant needs to work with <br />Staff to make it a viable proposal Hedlund said he sees the plan as the best for the <br />property and reiterated the purchase was contingent on City approval. <br />Stoddard acknowledged the good design and elevations, but asked the applicant if he <br />would consider moving the garage to the west Sue Hedlund said the .vest side of the lot <br />w'as steep and questioned the encroachment of the bluff area Paul Hedlund also noted <br />that the well was located on the west side of the property. <br />During public comments, Charles Truman, who lives across the .t.-e • »:om this property, <br />voiced bJs approval of the proposal. He said it would cause no na' .Is:up to the <br />neiahborhood.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.