Laserfiche WebLink
^ 1 ■4-5«^'7-5*B3a Ol_VHP I m RESORT E> j.>E* P‘L-11 SEP 2V’'=m5. 12: lO <br />September 24.1996 <br />Mr. Ron Moorse <br />City Administrator <br />City of Orono <br />P.O. Box 66 <br />Crystal Bay, MN 55323 <br />Dear Mr. Moorse: <br />We have been transferred out of state and my <br />employer has entered into a contract with a relocation <br />company to sell our home. The listing contract id between <br />Burnet Realty (Rhonda Wilson) and the relocation eompany. <br />The relocation company will not accept any offer containing <br />a contingency. We have an offer on our homo including the <br />adjoining lot, which we do not presently own. Since our <br />home does not have a gxirage, or space to build one, Rhonda <br />Wilson has urged us to attempt to purchase the lot to assure <br />the sale of cur home. We are asking you to consider our <br />request for forgiveness of the penalty and interest due on <br />the adjoining lot and reassess it in the prin^^^ amount of <br />$3,350, with the option of payment over a 5 year period, <br />assumable by subsequent owners. The following explanation is <br />submitted for your considci n. <br />In 1980, city sewer was placed in Minnetonka Bluffs. The <br />City split the ao^^asmont for Lot 1 equally between Lots 1 <br />and 24 as the ’ were both owned by the same party. They did <br />not require the 2 lots to be combined, however. <br />When we purchased lot 1 (500 Hanlon Ave) in 1985, our <br />purchase agreement provided that we assume all special <br />assessments. Wo paid them off over time and had no <br />knowledge thet what we were paying was only 1/2 of the <br />assessment. The seller did not disclose that he owned lot <br />24 and that it had an assessment relative to lot 1. Had we <br />known, wc would,perhaps, have negotiated the purchase differently, <br />requiring the seller to pay the assessments. Lot 1 was <br />assessed $3,350 and lot 24 was assessed $3,350, even though <br />it was not a buildable lot. The seller never made a payment <br />and lot 24 subsequently went into tax forfeiture. <br />In 1985, we approached the City Council with a request to