Laserfiche WebLink
«>v.REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION '‘N, <br />DATE; October 11, 1996 <br />ITEM NO: <br />Department Approval : <br />Name Ron Moorse <br />Title City Administrator <br />Item Description: <br />Administrator Reviewed:Agenda Section: <br />Administrator ’s Report <br />Highway 12 Corridor Proposal and Public Hearing <br />Background <br />Since the Highway 12 corridcr issue resurfaced in the late 1980’s, with the discussion of four- <br />lane freeway alternatives cutting through cither the northerly or southerly part of Orono; the <br />city’s position regarding the corridor was that the corridor for an upgrade of Highway 12 should <br />be developed as close to the present corridor as possible, and that residential impacts be limited <br />and the natural environment be protected. This position has been translated into efforts in <br />opposition to a south bypass and north bypass in favor of finding a solution that is as close to <br />the current Highway 12 corridor as possible. <br />The city’s position regi rding the corridor also included an effort to encourage communication <br />at all levels between th«; cities of Long Lake and Orono to provide a forum for the exchange of <br />ideas and concerns for the purpose of developing a mutual plan/agreement between both cities. <br />In keeping with the city’s position, a mediation process was initiated in 1993, between Mn/DOT <br />and the city councils of Long Lake and Orono; in an effort to work toward a mutual <br />plan/agreement between the cities regarding a corridor for the upgrade of Highway 12. Out of <br />this process came the recognition that a four-lane alternative, whether on the current Highway <br />12 corridor or as a southern or northern bypass, would be very difficult to achieve for two <br />reasons. One, it would be very difficult to gain agreement from the cities of Long Lake and <br />Orono on a four-lane alternative. Two, the cost of a four lane alternative would be beyond the <br />funding ability of Mn/DOT. <br />A major obstacle to a highway upgrade solution on the current corridor was that current <br />Highway 12 would potentially need to continue to serve both as an efficient east/west route for <br />through traffic, and as the route serving local traffic circulation in Orono and Long Lake. These <br />two conflicting purposes were very difficult to reconcile. <br />The effort to reconcile the conflicting traffic movement purposes of Highway 12 led, in the <br />spring of 1995, to the development of the concept of a two-lane limited access roadway along <br />the Burlington Northern Railroad. This concept would reconcile the local traffic versus through <br />traffic conflict by removing the through traffic from current Highway 12, leaving current <br />Highway 12 to serve as the local circulation route. <br />After review of this concept, the cities of Long Lake and Orono, agreed to consider finding a <br />solution to the upgrade of Highway 12 within a corridor whose boundaries were the current <br />Highway 12 corridor on the north, and just south of the Burlington Northern Railroad on the <br />south.