Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION <br />MEETING HELD ON JULY 15, 1996 <br />(#3 - #2135 Paul and Sue Hedlund/Edna Albee Estate - Continued) <br />Peterson responded to the report noting the positive changes that were made. He <br />reported that the number of lakeshore variances requested with this application is similar <br />to that of other properties in the areas of Long Lake Boulev ard and Casco Point, which do <br />not meet zoning regulations Peterson said the City does not know when sewer will come <br />to the area, and he has no problem with a holding tank Peterson also reported that he <br />spoke with a neigltboring property owner to the east, Mj Bingham, who originally voiced <br />concern over the location of the ga*age near the side lot line but is in favor of the revision. <br />Peterson noted that the street setback is consistent with that of the neighborhood. The <br />bluff issue was said to be initiated by the state and does not seem to present a problem in <br />the aplication. Peterson also commented that the average lakeshore setback is not a <br />problem with this application due to the location of houses on nearby properties With <br />these notations. Peterson said the plan was still quite aggressive with the confined building <br />site. <br />JefFMartineau responded that the applicant has addressed the size of the home, which <br />Martineau says is consistent with the size of starter homes at 1092 s f with a 534 s.f. <br />garage and 38 s f deck Schroeder commented that the house was small because it was <br />bound by the size of the lot Peterson added if this was new construction, this home <br />would not be allowed to be built <br />Smith clarified that the second story does not extend over the master bedroom located on <br />the main floor. A future powder room area was noted on the floor plans but will not be <br />completed at this time There are two baths currently on the first floor. Smith suggested <br />removing the wall to open up the den area so it could not be used as bedroom The <br />applicant commented that the wall may be load bearing Smith asked that it be made clear <br />that the second story' powder room and first floor bedroom not be used as such. Lindquist <br />said that would realistically happen when sewer comes to the property. <br />Lindquist noted there was only a partial alternate site for septic. Gaffron agreed but noted <br />it would not be needed when sew er came in. The e.xisting system will be converted to a <br />holding tank and the drainfield eliminated. Schroeder asked what would happen if it was <br />found that sewer would not come for another five years Gaflron said the applicant may <br />then wish to replace the current septic system. <br />The applica.nt reported that it was their intent to notify potential buyers of a 3rd bedroom <br />possibility in the fiiture Lindquist asked if it was the applicant's intent to follow thru with <br />this proposal and rehabilitate the house and then sell it, or sell it now as-is. Martineau said <br />the intent was (o have the capability of showing potential buyers what the property could <br />be. Gattron noted that this could result in a buyer presenting a totally different plan to the <br />Commission at a future time. <br />There were no public comments.