Laserfiche WebLink
Request for Council Action continued <br />Page 3 <br />September 19, 1996 <br />Zoning File #2135 Paul and Sue Hedlund/Edna Albee Estate, 1575 Long Lake Boulevard <br />1. <br />2. <br />3. <br />4. <br />8 <br />Factors which make this a difficult lot in terms of development include steep <br />topography, shallow lot depth between street and lake leaving virtually no <br />conforming building envelope, and the location of the existing house almost <br />entirely within the 0-75' lakeshore setback zone. <br />Replacement of the existing detached garage which encroaches 0.2' into the <br />right-of-way, with an attached garage located 8' from the right-of-way, is a <br />positive improvement to the neighborhood. <br />The proposed location of the main portions of the house approximately 30' from <br />the street lot line is not inconsistent with other houses in the neighborhood on <br />the lake side of Long Lake Boulevard. The location of the existing house and <br />the unuesirability of constructing additions on the south side of the house, <br />justifies granting of the variance for additions on the north side of the house <br />awav from the lake. <br />The proposed second story additions and attached garage addition are modest in <br />scope and do not yield a residence structure that is out of character for this lot <br />in this neighborhood. <br />Neither adjacent lakeshore lot will have existing lake views encroached upon by <br />the proposed additions, hence the average lakeshore setback vziriance will have <br />no impact on those properties. <br />WTiile the second stor>’ addition and additions to the north side of the house are <br />substantially within the 0-75' lakeshore setback zone, those additions will not <br />create any new rooms or walls closer to the lake than the footprint of the <br />existing house, and the proposed plans yield a residence with a two story facade <br />on the lake side and a one story facade on the street side, thus limiting the <br />visual impact of the additions in the 0-75' zone. <br />While a small portion of the property is defined as bluff and work is proposed <br />in the bluff impact zone, the visual impact of such work will not be substantially <br />different from the existing visual impact, and grading, drainage and erosion <br />controls must be addressed suitably before the City will issue building permits. <br />Because the property will potentially be provided with municipal sewer within <br />one to two years, it is reasonable to allow conversion of the existing non- <br />conforming septic system to a holding tank system subject to a pumping contract <br />being provided to the City. Further, the fact that there is a suitable drainfield <br />site that could accommodate primary and alternate drainfield systems for a two <br />bedroom home, suggests that the residence should not increase above the level <br />i <br />A <br />i <br />1