Laserfiche WebLink
Request for Council Action continued <br />Page 2 <br />September 19, 1996 <br />Zoning File #2135 Paul and Sue Hedlund/Edna Albee Estate, 1575 Long Lake Boulevard <br />The w-est end of the existing house is technically defined as a blutf area, although the east end <br />is not a bluff. Applicants have provided a grading plan indicating how the revised driveway <br />grading and retaining walls at the northwest comer of the house will be constructed to <br />eliminate erosion concerns. <br />Septic/Sewer Proposal <br />The property currently contains a septic system considered to be non-conforming. A site exists <br />on the property, that would accomodate primary and alternate drainfields to serve a 2-bedroom <br />house, but there is not quite enough area for an alternate site if the system is built to serve 3 <br />bedrooms. Because this is in one of the sewer "hot spots", the applicants propose a multi ­ <br />faceted approach to dealing with the septic system issue, including: <br />that the additions and remodeling be allowed at this time but limited to two <br />bedrooms. <br />that the existing septic tanks be disconnected from the drainfield (if one exists) <br />and be converted to a holding tank system. <br />that the owner will supply the City with a fully executed pumping contract from <br />a licensed contractor. <br />that the owner will draft and record a restrictive covenant on the property that <br />will not allow the property to become " ‘hree bedroom home until City sewer <br />has been approved and been installed to the property. <br />After much discussion, Planning Commission agreed to this, subject to design revisions to <br />eliminate the closet in the den, and remove the south wall of the den if it is not a bearing wall. <br />Planning Commission felt, and staff agrees, that these restrictions are reasonable and protect <br />both the property owner and the City whether or not municipal sewer is provided to this <br />neighborhood. <br />Planning Commission Recommendation <br />At their July 15 meeting. Planning Commission voted 5 to 1 to recommend approval of the <br />revised proposal, subject to the septic system conversion to holding tank system with a <br />pumping contract, subject to the two bedroom restriction via a covenant and subject to design <br />changes, and subject to submittal of a detailed site grading plan for City approval, which has <br />been reviewed and conditionally accepted by the City Engineer. Planning Commission based <br />their approval on the following findii gs: <br />I