Laserfiche WebLink
Zoning #2131 <br />July 9, 1996 <br />Page 2 <br />List of Exhibits <br />A - Application <br />B - Plat Map <br />C - Property Owners ’ List <br />D - Neighbors' Acknowledgement Form <br />E-1-2 Adjacent Neighbors' Approval Letters <br />F - Floor Plan-Location of Additional Hardcover from Upper Level Deck <br />Floor Plan-Upper Level Deck <br />■ Survey <br />• Hardcover Inventory 75-250' Setback Area <br />• Average Lakeshore Setback Site Plan <br />G <br />H <br />I <br />J <br />K-1-4 Staff Letters to Applicant <br />Description of Request <br />Applicant seeks approval of variances that would allow an upper level deck at 65.5 s.f. installed <br />at the lakeside of the residence. The majority of the structure is located over a lower level <br />deck. Refer to Exhibits F, G and H, the improvement results in an 11.5 s.f. increase of <br />hardcover where excesses of hardcover exist within the 75-250' setback area. ITie entire upper <br />level deck area is credited as structural coverage against the property. Review Exhibit J, the <br />proposed deck w ill be located 21' in front of the average lakeshore setback line. The existing <br />lower level deck encroaches the setback line by 31.6'. The upper level deck appears to have <br />little impact upon the lakeshore views of the adjacent residents. Review Exhibits D and E, the <br />neighbors are aware of the proposed improvement and have submitted letters of approval. <br />Review Exhibit F, applicant offers removal of existing hardcover improvements to offset the <br />11.5 s.f increase. He proposes reduction in gravel drive/parking area or comers of lower deck. <br />In 1984, applicant received variance approval for construction of the new two story garage and <br />decks at lakeside of residence. Applicant applied for building permits for all improvements. <br />Review Exhibits K-1-4, applicant was first advised of the violation in October of 1993. The <br />after-the-fact variance application was filed in April of 1996. The survey submitted with the <br />application was found to be inadequate. Applicant was required to provide an updated survey <br />and hardcover inventory for the variance review. <br />i <br />■