My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
07-22-1996 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
1996
>
07-22-1996 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/5/2023 11:39:47 AM
Creation date
9/5/2023 11:38:22 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
162
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION CfTVc^ <br />DATE: July 15, 1996 <br />ITEM NO.: ^ <br />Department Approval: <br />Name Jeanne A. Mabusth <br />Title Building & Zoning Adminisuator <br />Administrator Reviewed: <br />ff/'"- <br />Agenda Section: <br />Zoning <br />Item Description: Dennis Kirby/Melanie Rose, 1020 Borwn Road North - Request of City <br />_________________to Issue Building Permit Without Required Survey_________________ <br />Review of Request <br />In reviewing tq>plicants' letter and spe^ng to the Building Official, Lyle Oman. I am advised <br />the original deck was to be repaired by simple board replacements involving no structural <br />improvements. During the process of repair, it was soon discovered that the structural supports <br />also had to be replaced. The complete reconstruction of the deck either in the existing, an <br />expanded or reduced footprint requires a building permit. In order to complete the building <br />permit application, a survey is required to confirm that the reconstructed deck will meet <br />required setbacks. The City has reviewed the address files and has confirmed there is no lot <br />survey on record. Applicants' site plan. Exhibit B, is unclear as to where setbacks were <br />measured - from traveled road or original iron survey monuments installed at the time of the <br />plat? <br />The property is located within the RR-IB, two acre, rural residential zoning district. The lot <br />is approximately 41,745 s.f. in lot area and would be allowed approximately 6,267 s.f. or 15% <br />structural coverage. Structural coverage does not appear to be of issue. <br />Review Exhibit C, the staff sketch. The decks will be reinstalled along the east side of the <br />existing residence. The property is a comer lot and achieves access via Brown Road North. <br />The Code defines the west lot line or the lot line adjacent to Brown Road as the front lot line. <br />The north lot line or lot line adjacent to Country Club Road is a side street lot line and the <br />east lot line is the rear lot line (opposite the front lot line). Setbacks in question would be the <br />setback from Country Club Road and the rear lot line, both requiring a 50' setback. <br />In the mid-80's the City adopted a survey exemption procedure for property owners wishing <br />to install detached accessory stmctures of less than 1,000 s.f as outlined on Page 1 of the <br />building permit application handout. Exhibit E. The Kirby/Rose request involves an addition <br />to the principal stmcture and would not fall under the approved exemption procedure. <br />Staff Recommendation <br />Staff would recommend that applicants provide merely a certification of the north and east <br />setbacks of the decks to be rebuilt in order to confirm that a 50' setback is met. If the setback <br />is not met, applicants may either alter proposed deck plans to meet the 50' setback or apply <br />for the necessary variance.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.