My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
07-08-1996 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
1996
>
07-08-1996 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/5/2023 11:26:43 AM
Creation date
9/5/2023 11:23:09 AM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
425
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
J <br />Request for Council Action continued <br />Page 2 <br />Jul®:’2, 1996 <br />Zoning File #2136 Greenfield Corporation, 180 North Shore Drive West <br />List of Exhibits <br />A - Amended Resolution <br />B-1-2 Stu} 'Sketches <br />C - Amen<‘;d Preliminar)' Plan <br />Review of Amended Plan <br />Applicant's sur\eyor has provided a 30' wide private driveway outlot that will ser\e as access <br />to Lots 1, 3 and 4. A temporar>' cul-de-sac has been shown at the northeast comer. A cul-de- <br />sac in its present location appears to serve no purpose nor does the Code require a cul-de-sac <br />or turnaround for a driveway at less than 500'. Review Exhibit B-2, the staff sketch shows the <br />impact on the building site of Lot 4 as stmeture would have to be 50' from the edge of the <br />cul-de-sac. The future residents would be best served by a backout pad being provided within <br />Outlot B. There is adequate room within 50' Outlot B to provide a backout pad for emergency <br />vehicles. A pemianent cul-de-sac will be located within property to the east when private road <br />is developed. The Code does not require a cul-de-sac for a legal driveway. The Comp Plan <br />recommends that the Cit>' should have special width requirements when drive serves more than <br />one resident. <br />With the amended plan. Lot 1 no longer needs a lot width variance. Lot 3 has been expanded <br />to 142' width rather than a 90' width and Lot 4 remains at 150'. It will be necessary to define <br />the legal accesses to each of the lots, specifically Lot 4. Review Exhibit B-1, note the impact <br />on the building envelope if access is achieved from Outlot B. Lot 4’s front lot line must <br />remain at the north to maintain a feasible building envelope (no setback variances needed). <br />Staff has been advised that the developer will not be the builder of the future residences on <br />the proposed lots. Staff is concerned that a future builder may propose a building site to the <br />south of the septic test areas on Lot 3 Constmetion to the south for Lot 4 is not possible <br />because of the location of the protected wetland area. Staff recommends adding a condition <br />that no residential construction (principal or accessory construction) will be allowed to the south <br />of the septic test sites within Lot 3. <br />Staff has amended the original approval resolution to include the following: <br />1.Engineer to provide specs or standards for private driveway to serve three lots. <br />Roadway shall be paved. A temporar>’ backout pad shall be installed within <br />Outlot B to facilitate emergency vehicles or other larger vehicles. Temporary <br />cul-de-sac to be eliminated.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.