My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
06-10-1996 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
1996
>
06-10-1996 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/5/2023 10:51:55 AM
Creation date
9/5/2023 10:49:14 AM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
306
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
niVUTBS OP THE PLAHWim: COminf lON MRETlItC RP.LD JULY 20, 1^07 <br />#1I7( POT1CAM COUTIHUCD <br />It w <br />r^crrr*'r i <br />f*c*r <br />4, Na\« <br />*■ 1 ; : r.m Kr 1 1 ey» sccor.drd by Cohen, * <br />rr : ^ 1 ! * p:opcs«l bnsrd on i nsu f f i «*•• •• <br />r 1 *'r lakeshore setback. Motion, Ay»' <br />r voted nay. <br />t .• • <br />Ill7f <br />4145 <br />SKTfCII <br />HICBAPL <br />FLAB <br />FlAlfl <br />ROAD <br />MCVXDi <br />m P • « <br />3 <br />,» <br />Assistar* <br />sketch pla <br />house 11.1 * : s <br />Bescluticr *1127. <br />easterly access <br />• :rinistrator Caffron explained the <br />v:de off second dwelling from main <br />rino required as a condition of <br />Apr 1 leant has been allowed to use <br />p#'nding this subdivision request. <br />Applicant IS subritting two preliminary proposals review <br />f or: <br />1) Conceptual r^'view oI the proposed driveway accevs <br />corridor; and <br />2» Conceptual review of the proposed lot lire <br />revision wit.h •ho applicants westerly property. Ths <br />boundary c.harar ;s intended to give applicant more <br />land in the easterly parcel by dropping the westerly <br />parcel to the p;::imum of 5.0 acres dry buildable. <br />Applicant pref,-rs Proposal I, leaving 5.0 dry acrer <br />in Lots 1 and 2 and 14.4 total acres in Lot 3, a <br />flag Ic*" with a 30* access corridor to serve that <br />house over the driveway that is in place (access <br />point to be meved so it is within the JO* corridor). <br />Staff has r.c f rcMem with this access location on <br />Watertown Poad f rom a safety standpoint. Proposal <br />II IS essential ly the same but leaves a 5C access <br />corridor. Staff prefers Proposal II. The wetland in <br />the westerly parcel (Lot 1) has what staff would <br />call an '■indefinite* boundary. <br />Chairman Kelley felt it <br />prior to ^ry approval. <br />eiportant to define the wetJan»l <br />Mr. 4 Mrs. MtcS.ael PlanK vere present for this matter. <br />Michael Plank stated that after the wetland is defined. <br />Lot 2 will be adjusted to meet the minimum of 5.0 acre.s <br />dry buildable. <br />«!•Assistant Tonino Adrjr.is' ? ator Gaffron noted that the <br />adjacent neighbor, Joe Saw :iuk, 4105 Watertown Road# has <br />concerns with the access recause it is so close to his <br />house. <br />Mrs. Plank stated t>.3t it : their intention to heavily <br />screen the access from tb*» '"swchuk property to protect <br />the privacy for both prop-**" * owners. <br />•^ouri OOCUMENr <br />I
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.