Laserfiche WebLink
\nNUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMNUSSION <br />^ffiETING HELD ON NOVEMBER 20, 1995 <br />(#5 - #2088 Winfield Stephens - Continued) <br />Mabu^haskcdforPlanningCo — <br />appUcant to proceed with the vacat.on of the alley, <br />Gardiner said he had offered a neighbor S2.000 to consider the vacation but had received <br />no reply. <br />Gardiner asked if the Conmission would consider option #1. Berg asked w here the <br />garage would go. <br />Steohens asked if the vacation of the alley could no. be done, if the process could proceed <br />Person std the garage would still need to be addressed <br />Gardiner renrarked that he had purchased the propeny in 1982, and the garage was built <br />before that time <br />tindquis. moved. Smith seconded, to table Application .2088, Vote: Ayes 5, Nays 0. <br />Peterson suggested the applicants put the burden on the neighbor to determine the <br />driveway easement. <br />The Certificate of Mailing and Affidavit of Publication were noted. <br />The applicant was represented by Jack Neveaux. <br />Mabusth said the application was for a homestead <br />cnatnal subdivision application was fi^^ed m 1994 had al ° ^j, ^he 1/2 <br />,.-.el. The cur^nt JSirl.oIhe east contains <br />Togo S? Sna now, according to Mabusth are two boarded up structures, one <br />;.ruc.u. e had been mmoved, and one rental untt structure. <br />Mabusth reported that the applicant seet.s I O' <br />LZteetlofirrdtSgdemct^^^^^^ <br />no lakLhore decks proposed with new cons.ntctton plans. <br />•14