My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
05-13-1996 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
1996
>
05-13-1996 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/5/2023 10:12:05 AM
Creation date
9/5/2023 10:07:05 AM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
292
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
DNR HETRO REGION TEL :Gi:-772-7-?77 Hpr 12.'?G No.013 P.03 <br />Ml. JflMM Mabaaih <br />Afrill2.1996 <br />4 Por your infonnation, I diicussod • couple other posiible ctormwiter management techniques with at <br />one resident of the project area. These are techniques which may not be feasible for this site, but <br />which the city may want to keep in mind for f\iture projects. <br />a.When twmce arc near the tops of bluffs or steep slopes, such as arc oAen seen along creeks or <br />ravines, runoiT from gutters or from the structure itself can become concentrated and cause <br />oroaion problems. However, in oixkr to minimize these problems, the gutters on the homes can <br />be directed to the fronts of the structures (i.e., away from the steep slopes) and run over a <br />vegetated area or through a longer, flatter area before eotenng the area with the steep slopes. <br />With wnalier rains, most of the water should have an opportunitt’ to infllvatc before rcac^g <br />the steeper, erosive areas. I know, for example, that Riley>Purgatoiy«Bluff Creek Watershed <br />District has succcssfrilly required this type of runoff rodiroction for developments along stoq) <br />crock volleys. <br />b.Current development standards usually require ponding to detain the excess runoff produced <br />with a development (over pre*projoct cooditioos), with the intent to koqi the rate of ninoff and <br />the flooding elevations no higher than before the development More recently, ponding for <br />purposes of improv'ing the water quality of (he water that leaves the site has been a roquironiont. <br />While the importance of the current design of ponds for water quality treatment and flooding <br />oootrol should not be minimized, it should be recognized that even if this ponding is provided <br />that the total volume of runoff from the more impervious sites is increased. Although the flows <br />may not be increased for the peak flood period, the base flows or more “nonnal” flows are <br />increased. This leads to changes in the character of streams or ravines, and can cause serious <br />eroaioQ and sodiraontation problems as well as loss of vegetation and habitat for fish or wildlife. <br />Thercfbre, where it is feasible, we would encourage ponding that is intended to bold the excess <br />runoff on>sitc and not overflow to existing flowage systems (except for in oxtromo events, such <br />as the 100«year storm). <br />Please contact me at 772-7910 (772-7914 direct/voice mail) should you have eny questions regarding theee <br />comments. <br />Sincerely. <br />Ceil Strauss <br />Area Hydrologist <br />c:Forest Lake File (27-139P) <br />Lake Minnetonka - Jennings Bay (27-133-16)
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.