Laserfiche WebLink
u, <br />Criteria for Determining Undue Hardship <br />1. <br />2. <br />4. <br />5. <br />6. <br />The property in question cannot be put to a reasonable use if used under conditions <br />allowed by the official controls. <br />The variance is for an accessory structure. It is reasonable for a property owner to want to <br />have an enclosed parking area for storage of vehicles. The residence can continue to be used <br />as a dwelling without a double garage, however, most of the other properties in this area have <br />double garages with the same 50' lot width. <br />The plight of the landowner is due to circumstances unique to his property not created <br />by the landowner. <br />The plight of the landowner is due to the lot width and lot area of the property and the <br />location of a well on the property. <br />3. The variance, if granted, will not alter the essential character of the locality. <br />The variance w ill not change the character of the area. <br />Economic considerations alone shall not constitute an undue hardship if reasonable <br />use for the property exists under the terms of this chapter. <br />Economic factors are not a consideration with this application. <br />Undue hardship also includes, but is not limited to, inadequate access to direct sunlight <br />for solar energy systems. <br />Solar access is not a consideration. <br />The Board of Appeals and Adjustments or the Council may not permit as a variance <br />for any use that is not permitted under this Chapter for the property in the zone where <br />the affected person's land is located. <br />Accessory structures are allowed in this residential district. <br />U2236 William Bockmann <br />1090 Loma Linda Avenue <br />Variance <br />5/19/97