My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
03-25-1996 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
1996
>
03-25-1996 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/31/2023 4:15:25 PM
Creation date
8/31/2023 4:10:51 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
265
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION <br />MEE-ING held on FEBRUARY 20, 1996 <br />ACTION ITEMS <br />The Certificate of Mailing and Affidavit of Publication were noted <br />The applicants were represented by Attorney, Robert Mitchell. <br />Mabusth reported that the application was for a renewal variance seeking approval of <br />multiple variances to allow construction of a new residence and removal of the extsting <br />residence which is located closer to the lake than the new residence will be. The property <br />is sewered The new smaller footprint is 38\60’ for a 2-story structure to be located 1 <br />from the west side lot line, 11.7' from the east side lot line, 43‘ from the street where a 50 <br />setback is require.' -Uvd proposed at 20' from the lakeshore of the mam lake^ During the <br />1994 review it was questioned as to whether the DNR would approve the 20 lakeshore <br />setback A letter is included in the packet noting the approval by the DNR of the .0 <br />setback from the main lake. The home is currently located 75' from the lagoon, and the <br />new construction is also proposed 75' from the lagoon meeting the required setback. A <br />structural coverage variance is required, but there will be a 168 s f reduction in structural <br />coverage. There will also be a hardcover reduction with the new construction. <br />Mabusth noted that the Planning Commission had recommended approval of the prior <br />application, and the Council had approved it. This application is a renewal with no <br />chances. <br />Attorney Mitchell said the applicants' house had not sold, and applicants had decided to <br />delay construction of a new house. <br />There were no public comments. <br />Lindquist moved. Smith seconded, to approve the renewal variance application with <br />conditions as noted by Staff. Vote Ayes 4, Nays 0. <br />(#4) #2106 WILLIAM AND LAVRA STODDARD, 2605 KELLY AVENUE - <br />VARIANCE - PUBLIC HEARING 7:06-7:11 P.M. <br />The Certificate of .Mailing and /Mfidavit of Publication w ere noted. <br />The Applicants were present.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.