02-12-1996 Council Packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Zoning File #2100 January 8, 1996 Page 2 Gl-4 - Hardcover Fact Sheet H - Engineer’s Report 1/5/96 11-3 - Floor Plan Three Levels J - Elevations West and East - North and South elevations have not been submitted with application information Description of Request Applicants propose the removal of all existing improvements and the construction of a ne\v residence requiring a lot width variance as property measures 101’ at both the OHWL and 75 ’ setback. The code requires a 140 ’ width. The structure will meet all required setbacks ot the LR-IB zoning district. Based on the height definition, height shall be determined at the 962 elevation (962 ’ = highest elevation adjacent to residence. 952.5 + 10 ’ = 962.5'). At 1 1/2 acres the property has adequate area to support all proposed hardcover improvements as portions of the new structure will be located both in 75-250 ’ and 250-500 ’ setback areas. The new structure will be located behind the average lakeshore setback line determined by the residence structures located to the north and south of the proposed residence. The fomier residence on this property (located closer to shoreline) sustained drainage/flooding problems over the years which former owner claimed were intensified with the new construction to the north. Filling of the building pad will also provide insurance from flooding of the proposed residence and will also provide the desired walkout design. Review E.xhibit H, the engineer approves the proposed grading and drainage plan but is concerned that applicant proposes boulder walls where portions of the wall on both the north and south lot lines will exceed a 4’ height. UTiere walls e.xceed 4’, the engineer asks that modular masonry' block walls be considered and that a structural design be provided for all wall sections o\er the 4’ height. Review Exhibit F, note the area on north side of the residence just to the east ot the garage. Staff would ask why the area could not be filled and grades tie into a swale adjacent to lot line rather than installing a retaining wall and attempting to control drainage from house m the limited area between wall and house. Staff would also like more detail on the drainage along the soutli side to the east of the retaining wall at the 954’ to 952 ’ elevation. Will drainage flow onto adjacent property to south? How shall drainage be controlled along lot line to ensure that drainage does not flow- to residence at north but is directed further east? Statement of Hardship Refer to Exhibit B.