Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO CITY COUNCIL <br />MEETING HELD ON DECEMBER IL 1995 <br />- #2084 Thomas McCune - Continued) <br />The applicant said this was not discussed with the Planning Commission. It was his belief <br />that the sewering would occur in the near future. McCune said the proposal for the two <br />additions show what his overall plans are for the property, and now the plans are <br />predicated on when sewering will occur. He asked that the resolution state that the <br />additions could be constructed when either sewer or a conforming septic were in place. <br />Goetten noted that the sewering of the area relies on a favorable decision by the Met <br />Counc;':. <br />Callahan asked Jabbour if it was his desire that the draft of the letter of credit note that <br />either septic or sewer occur. Gaffron noted that condition #3 refers to this request. <br />Hurr moved, Goetten seconded, to approve Resolution #3651 with amendments made to <br />the resolution as noted that the additions could be constructed when sewer or a <br />conforming septic were in place as noted in condition #3. Vote; Ayes 4, Nays 0. <br />(#7) #1958 LOUIS OBERHAUSER, 2405 DUNWOODY AVENUE, 3865 AND <br />3877 SHORELINE DRIVE - REPLAT - PRELIMINARY SUBDIVISION AND <br />VARIANCES <br />The applicant was present. <br />Mabusth reported that the application was for the preliminary subdivision of the replat of <br />3 substandard lots. Four sta'ctures have e.xisted on the property with one having been <br />removed. Lot 1 '<s 16,500 s.f, and Lot 2 is 20,000 s f The lots do not meet the lot width <br />standard nor the OHW or the 75 ’ setback from the lakeshore. There is encroachment of <br />the 0-75 ’ setback zone with a timber wall on Lot 2 A structural coverage variance <br />would be required for the proposal for Lot 1 only at 15 16%. Lot 2 ’s structural coverage <br />is proposed at 10% The garage is located at 20 ’ from the street setback and is proposed <br />at 10 ’. The e.xisting detached garage encroaches into the right of way 6'. <br />Mabusth informed the Council that the Platini ng Commission would not approve any new <br />development plan with hardcover in the 0-75 ’ zone. The Commission saw no reason to <br />retain any improvements in this area. The >ciiOinmendation tor approval was based on no <br />hardcover in this 0-75 ’ zone. The Commission approved the 10 ’ side setback but would <br />not approve any structural coverage varrance. T he applicant was asked to adjust the lot <br />line accordingly. <br />The hardcover on Lot 1 in the 75-250 ’ zone is proposed from 59.07% to 36.03%, a <br />reduction of 20.03%. Lot 2 hardcover in this same zone exists at 36.7%, is proposed at <br />33.23%, for a reduction of449 s.f or,S.5%. The Planning Commission recommended <br />approval of the proposed hardcove-.