My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
01-08-1996 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
1996
>
01-08-1996 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/31/2023 2:57:48 PM
Creation date
8/31/2023 2:55:59 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
208
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO CITY COUNCIL <br />MEETING HELD ON DECEMBER 11,1995 <br />(#6 - #2084 Thomas McCune - Continued) <br />Gafifron commented that since the Planning Commission meeting. Staff realized the septic <br />system was non-conforming and subject to upgrade concurrent with any permits. <br />Because of the likelihood that City sewer will be installed, the applicant would like to do <br />the sunroom addition and remodel. The code calls for an upgraded septic. It was <br />discussed that a letter of credit along with a septic agreement might be appropriate. A <br />letter from the applicant noted that the time of year made septic testing impossible to <br />perform. Staff believes that there is a probable location for septic and testing would not <br />be critical. Staff would like a review before a new septic ts installed. Gaffron asked the <br />Council if they would accept the variances without septic testing being performed. <br />Callahan asked if the letter of credit without testing can be arranged. Gatfron confirmed <br />this and noted that this was brought up for consistency. Hurr asked if a different letter <br />would be used for winter time. Gaffron said different wording would be required. <br />Hurr said she had a concern with the hardcover over 25°o with new construction. Hurr <br />noted the other zones contained less than the allowable hardcover and questioned what <br />would occur if the applicant proposed to add more stmcture at a future date within these <br />other zones. Hurr questioned if this was a package for the entire property. Gaffron said <br />Staff was looking at it as a package but the code does not stipulate that. He asked the <br />Council whether future proposals should be allowed. <br />Jabbour said the combination of the proposal could determine what happens at a future <br />date. He reported being concerned with clustering by the lake Jabbour said if a 5-10% <br />variance was allowed, it should be decided whether the 250-500 ’ zone should lose that <br />much in allowable structure Hurr concurred that it should be tied in ogether. Gaffron <br />said he could amend the wording of the resolution to stipulate that the 30% allowed in <br />the 250-500' zone would be reduced by the square footage for the 75-250' area that was <br />over the allowable. Hurr asked that the resolution be amended to deduct the amount <br />over the allowable. <br />Callahan said he was concerned with approving the garage when the applicant does not <br />plan on constructing the garage until the sewer comes to the property. He would like to <br />see the applicant ask for approval when construction can be done. <br />Jabbour said he would rather let the applicant make that choice, a mound system, hook <br />up to sewer or the addition. <br />Gaffron said the proposal is to for construction to occur when sewer becomes available. <br />Jabbour commented on the letter of credit for the new septic. Gaffron agreed that this <br />was the purpose of the letter, but the applicant did not plan on replacing the septic.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.