My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
01-08-1996 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
1996
>
01-08-1996 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/31/2023 2:57:48 PM
Creation date
8/31/2023 2:55:59 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
208
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMipiON <br />MEETING HELD ON SEPTEMBER 18, 199d <br />(#5 - #2059 Minnehaha Creek Watershed District - Continued) <br />sufficient to condition Orono’s approval on the completion of the e>r p <br />LaBounty said he would luniish an anisfs rendition of the reveaetation and wiil meet with <br />Pearce. <br />Vote; Ayes 6, Nays 0. <br />The Planning Commissioners asked to schedule a joint meeting with the Council regarding <br />this project. <br />(#6) #2060 TIM FEYO AND ICAREN FULLER-FEYO, 4055 ELM STREET - <br />VARIANCE RENEWAL - PUBLIC HEARING 9:40-9:55 P.xM. <br />The Certificate of Mailing and Affidavit of Publication were noted. <br />Gaffron noted that the applicarion was for a renew^ of a lot <br />granted in 1978 1980, and 1994. The property is located in the LR-IB sin^e f^ly <br />^eshore residential zoning district requiring 1 acre on Elm Street, west of Tonkawa^ A <br />54% variance for lot area is requested for the .46 acre lot. The lot meets the lot width <br />requirement as it contains 1 IS’or 84% of the 140’ standard, where 80% or 11- is required <br />for existing lots of record. <br />Gaffion reported that the three lots were combined into one parcel and received approval <br />foonirim in 1994 with lO’ side setbcdc 3 O’ rear, and 35’ from setbaclc <br />The izrading plan showing the driveway meets the satisfaaion of the Engineer. Concern <br />with the grading is from direa runoff travelmg downhill. A proposed downspout and <br />underground tile will direct drainage to the road ditch at the from of the lot, from whicn it <br />flows to North Arm. <br />Paterson received confirmation that there are no changes to the application, and it is a <br />renewal application only. Peterson inquired of the appUcant if it was their intention to do <br />anything the property. Fe>'o said it is their mtention to seU or build. The Feyos are <br />in the process of securing loans. It was noted that the shed belonging to the neighbor is <br />still located on the Feyo property. <br />Schroeder inquired if there was a lot line problem. Gaffion said the shed still exists over <br />the lot line and the neighbors still disagree. Schroeder asked that the lot line be located <br />and stipulate the location of the shed.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.