My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
01-08-1996 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
1996
>
01-08-1996 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/31/2023 2:57:48 PM
Creation date
8/31/2023 2:55:59 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
208
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
r MEsrUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION <br />MEETING HELD ON SEPTEMBER 18. 1995 <br />(#5 - #2059 Minnehaha Creek Watershed District - Continued) <br />Pearce felt it would be to the City's interest to include conations in the <br />between Orono and the MCWD. A summary of these condiuons ® . <br />Commission members. The conditions are intended to reduce the imp^ <br />be restorative of the area. Fontaine said there has been difficulty ^ <br />complying with timely notice to Pearce with regards to revision ot toUow <br />thru on design elements. He believes it is in the best interest o t e i ^ ^j^e <br />of their review an artist’s rendition of the area showing the revege^^^^^^ <br />differences between the specificauons and what the MCWD is <br />is necessary for the MCWD to speU out the mamtenance requirements J <br />what, wlTpaying. and on what schedule. Specific recommendanons were given m the <br />handout for such maintenance. <br />Schroeder commenied that the projea was complicated and ask^gf‘oo°'“d the <br />has bom due to the project. Pearce indicated engineenns costs have mn S85.000, and <br />easement will only recover about S20.000. Schroeder noted that the <br />report will have a positive influence on the project. It was also his beUet ta <br />rateting is required for the Commission to look cv-er the findings, espeaally m hght of the <br />time and cost consideration Pearce has given to the project. <br />LaBounty said the project began in 1988. It was originally proposed to <br />in Medina, then was changed to two ponds in Long Lake, ’•“n f ang o <br />Pearce pond and DeerhiU. and now to include Long Lake Meoina, and Orono. The <br />phosphLs reduction amounts have remained the sarne. LaBounty <br />agreement can be acquired on the DeerhUl Road pond, the projea would be back to a o <br />acre pood on the Pearce property. <br />LaBounty asked, regarding the 7 engineering findings, that while 1-5 met with the MCWD <br />approval#6 LaBounty would like the agency to be treated as would any <br />a«^encv On #7 the special conditions under which hauling can oe stopped L^oumy sm <br />fines can be imposed on the contraaor. He ftinher noted no fertilizer would be us^ and <br />tree removal hi been taken care of To control erosion, LaBounty said the slope down to <br />the pond would be 4:1 with a 6; 1 slope out of the pond. <br />Peterson moved, Schroeder seconded, to table the application. <br />Fontaine noted that LaBounty has only recently taken over the project for the MCWD and <br />has done a good job with communicating with Pearce. <br />Schroeder asked that copies be made of the Barr repon for the Commissioners. <br />Smith thanked Mr. Pearce for his time and co.st considerations he has taken.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.