Laserfiche WebLink
227600v1 <br />10 <br /> <br /> <br />Contractor, Subcontractors, suppliers, their agents or employees, or other persons or entities performing portions of <br />the Work. <br /> <br />§ 3.6.2.3 The Architect shall interpret and decide matters concerning performance under , and requirements of, the <br />Contract Documents on written request of either the Owner. The Architect’s response to such requests shall be made <br />in writing within any time limits agreed upon or otherwise with reasonable promptness. <br /> <br />§ 3.6.2.4 Interpretations and decisions of the Architect shall be consistent with the intent of, and reasonably <br />inferable from, the Contract Documents and shall be in writing or in the form of drawings. When making such <br />interpretations and decisions, the Architect shall endeavor to secure faithful performance by Contractor and shall not <br />be liable for results of interpretations or decisions rendered in good faith. The Owner’s decisions on matters relating <br />to aesthetic effect shall be final if consistent with the intent expressed in the Contract Documents. <br /> <br />§ 3.6.2.5 Unless the Owner and Contractor designate another person to serve as an Initial Decision Maker, as that <br />term is defined in AIA Document A201–2017, the Architect shall render initial decisions on Claims between the <br />Owner and Contractor as provided in the Contract Documents. <br /> <br />§ 3.6.3 Certificates for Payment to Contractor <br />§ 3.6.3.1 The Architect shall review and certify the amounts due the Contractor and shall issue certificates in such <br />amounts. The Architect’s certification for payment shall constitute a representation to the Owner, based on the <br />Architect’s evaluation of the Work as provided in Section 3.6.2 and on the data comprising the Contractor’s <br />Application for Payment, that, to the best of the Architect’s knowledge, information and belief, the Work has <br />progressed to the point indicated, the quality of the Work is in accordance with the Contract Documents, and that the <br />Contractor is entitled to payment in the amount certified. The foregoing representati ons are subject to (1) an <br />evaluation of the Work for conformance with the Contract Documents upon Substantial Completion, (2) results of <br />subsequent tests and inspections, (3) correction of minor deviations from the Contract Documents prior to <br />completion, and (4) specific qualifications expressed by the Architect. <br /> <br />§ 3.6.3.2 The issuance of a Certificate for Payment shall not be a representation that the Architect has (1) made <br />exhaustive or continuous on-site inspections to check the quality or quantity of t he Work, (2) reviewed construction <br />means, methods, techniques, sequences or procedures, (3) reviewed copies of requisitions received from <br />Subcontractors and suppliers and other data requested by the Owner to substantiate the Contractor’s right to <br />payment, or (4) ascertained how or for what purpose the Contractor has used money previously paid on account of <br />the Contract Sum. <br /> <br />§ 3.6.3.3 The Architect shall maintain a record of the Applications and Certificates for Payment. <br /> <br />§ 3.6.4 Submittals <br />§ 3.6.4.1 The Architect shall review the Contractor’s submittal schedule and shall not unreasonably delay or <br />withhold approval of the schedule. The Architect’s action in reviewing submittals shall be taken in accordance with <br />the approved submittal schedule or, in the absence of an approved submittal schedule, with reasonable promptness <br />while allowing sufficient time, in the Architect’s professional judgment, to permit adequate review. <br /> <br />§ 3.6.4.2 The Architect shall review and approve, or take other appropriate action upon, the Contractor’s submittals <br />such as Shop Drawings, Product Data and Samples, but only for the limited purpose of checking for conformance <br />with information given and the design concept expressed in the Contract Documents. Review of such sub mittals is <br />not for the purpose of determining the accuracy and completeness of other information such as dimensions, <br />quantities, and installation or performance of equipment or systems, which are the Contractor’s responsibility. The <br />Architect’s review shall not constitute approval of safety precautions or construction means, methods, techniques, <br />sequences or procedures. The Architect’s approval of a specific item shall not indicate approval of an assembly of <br />which the item is a component. <br /> <br />§ 3.6.4.3 If the Contract Documents specifically require the Contractor to provide professional design services or <br />certifications by a design professional related to systems, materials, or equipment, the Architect shall specify the <br />appropriate performance and design criteria that such services must satisfy. The Architect shall review and take <br />appropriate action on Shop Drawings and other submittals related to the Work designed or certified by the <br />Contractor’s design professional, provided the submittals bear such profession al’s seal and signature when