12-08-1997 Council Packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Navarre Housing Study Yards Table 2.16 Condition of Driveway and Sidewalks Driveway/Sidewalks excellent good fair poor dilapidated Areal 23 (30%)31 (41%)15(20%)7 (9%)n/a Area II 25 (35%)18(25%)22 (31%)5 (7%)1 (1%) Area III 16 (64%)8 (32%)1 (4%) n/a n/a Area IV 24 (32%)29 (39%)20 (27%)1 (1%)n/a Total 88 (35%)86 (35%)58 (23%)13 (5%)1 (1%) The condition of sidewalks and driveways was evaluated. In most cases, driveways and sidewalks were in good to excellent condition. Those in fair and poor condition were experiencing cracking or overgrowth of weeds, depending on whether or not they were paved. There are also some driveways in these categories that had potholes. Table 2.17 Number of Paved and Unpaved Driveways paved unpaved both n/a Area I 41 (54%)33 (43%) 2 (3%)n/a Area II 37(51%)31 (43%)3 (4%)1 (1%) Area III 25 (100%)n/a n/a n/a Area IV 39 (52%)34 (45%)1 (1%)1 (1%) Total 142 (57%)98 (40%)6 (2%)2(1%) Whether driveways were paved, unpaved or both was noted. While most driveways were paved, there is a sizable number that were unpaved. Every driveway was paved in Area III. Table 2.18 Presence of Debris and Outdoor Storag e tdoor Storage excellent good fair poor dilapidated Area I •22 (29%)28 (37%)16(21%)5 (7%)5 (7%) Area II 6 (8%)23 (32%)24 (33%)13 (18%)6 (8%) Area III 12 (48%)10(40%)2 (8%)n/a 1 (4%) Area IV 12(16%)33 (44%)20 (27%)6 (8%)4 (5%) Total 52 (21%)94 (38%)62 (25%)24(10%)16(6%) The presence of debris and outdoor storage was observed. With the exception of Area III, all other areas had numerous properties in the poor to dilapidated categories. Many residences had miscellaneous items in their yard.