Laserfiche WebLink
r <br />Navarre Housing Study <br />of residences was evaluated. Most roofs were in fair to excellent <br />Table 2.4 <br />Conditi on ofSidjlng on <br />Siding <br />Areal <br />Area II <br />Area III <br />Area IV <br />Total <br />excellent <br />24 (32%) <br />20 (-8%) <br />12(48%) <br />27 (36%) <br />good <br />31 (41%) <br />23 (32%) <br />7 (28%) <br />23 (31%) <br />fair <br />15(20%) <br />20 (28%) <br />5 (20%) <br />17(23%) <br />poor <br />6 (8?/o) <br />5 (7%) <br />n/'a <br />7 (9%) <br />dilapidated <br />n/a <br />2 (3%) <br />n/a <br />n/a83 (33%)84 (34%)57 (23%)18(7%)2(1%) <br />mmlT Tlir °I- ?" “ evaluated. This issue was of minimal concern <br />especially tmeUho^iLsSvi'M ‘"f' ''f <br />siding in *e dilapS ea«,o^ “ "“P’' -«» <br />Table 2.5 <br />Type of .Siding on <br />Area I <br />Area II <br />Area III <br />Area IV <br />Total <br />^'ood ____brick <br />^C>(74%) l(lo/o) <br />58(81%) l(lo/o) <br />20(80%) n/a <br />48(64%) 1 i\%) <br />vinyl stucco other <br />Ti (14%) 7(9%) f(T%) <br />7 (1 0%) 4 (6%) n/a <br />4(16%) n/a n/a <br />18(24%) 6(8%) igo/o) <br />40(16%) 17(7%) 2(i^182 (73%) 3(1%) <br />Table 2.6 <br />Condition of Fonridf»tion nr| <br />Foundation <br />Area I <br />Area II <br />.\rea III <br />_______Area IV <br />Total <br />need paint <br />9(12%) <br />9(13%) <br />7 (28%) <br />8(11%) <br />33(13%) <br />g <br />excellent <br />20 (26%) <br />11 (15%) <br />11 (44%) <br />4 (5%) <br />good <br />35 (46%) <br />33 (46%) <br />13 (52%) <br />45 (60%) <br />fair <br />17 (22%) <br />21 (29%) <br />n/a <br />20 (27%) <br />poor <br />2 (3%) <br />3 (4%) <br />n/a <br />4 (5«/'o) <br />dilapidated <br />2 (3%) <br />2 (3%) <br />n/a <br />1 (1%)46 (19%)126 (51%)58 (23%)9 (4%)5 (2%)