Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION <br />MEETING HELD ON SEPTEMBER 15, 1997 <br />leeallv combined. Gaffron reported that the leaal combmation includes fssuance of a <br />separate tax number. He noted it was a contiguous tax parcel to the parcel across the <br />road but came out of a separate subdivision. Smith noted the issue is not one of continuity <br />but of relative space. Gaffron agreed. <br />Brooks informed the Commission that he would be uncomfortable with maintaining and <br />using property that he did not own. He felt the two properties are consistent in view of <br />drawing a logical line for ownership. <br />Schroeder asked if the dispute regarding the 20' land strip had any bearing on this <br />application. Gaffron said it is his understanding that it does not. The 20* strip is a <br />separate piece of land jointly owned by Floyd and Brooks. He indicated the case was <br />made by Brooks that would result in his acquiring the pordon on the south side of the <br />center line exclusive of the City road and would have no bearing on the combination but h <br />cannot occur unless this happens. <br />Hawn moved, Schroeder seconded, to grant the request as submitted with a legal <br />combmation of Lot 13 or special lot combination per Hennepm County. <br />McMillan asked that the motion include the clarification that the peninsula piece of land is <br />unbuildable. It was noted the parcel is in the 0-75' setback. A rational continuity is to be <br />shown for the combination to occur. It was noted that the special lot combmation allows <br />for a subdivision with special restrictions by covenants. <br />32 <br />-V