Laserfiche WebLink
«Wr <br />: <br />i f <br />MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION <br />MEETING HELD ON SEPTEMBER 15, IQ')? <br />he would need would not be available. He asked that consideration be aiven for how such <br />matters would be handled and who would be able to purchase the properties. His concern <br />is with preservation of the land. Floyd was concerned that the Planning Commission has <br />not been gjven the time to review the issues he addressed in his letter, <br />Jerry McCourtney. 1055 West Femdale, noted that this piece of parcel is the only beach <br />area for use by the area. He indicated that Mr. Floyd has use of the area for beach but has <br />never maintained it. McCourtney said Brooks has maintained it since purchasing it and <br />would like to add it to his property rather than see it revert to its prior condition. <br />r <br />Brooks said he would be willing to relocate the maple trees onto the shoreland on the <br />other side of the peninsula. He reiterated that the parcels would be combined. <br />Lindquist said he saw the detachment and reattachment as inconsistent. Lindquist voiced <br />his opinion that the land should stay as part of the adjoining land. <br />0 <br />Hawn said she was not against the application. Lindquist noted that there would be little <br />pieces of land but would be in support if the ownership was contiguous. <br />Stoddard was informed by Gafiron that he was unaware of any similar cases. Hawn noted <br />a property that has shoreland with an adjoining island. Gaffron acknowledged this but <br />noted both are owned by the same person inland from it but separate tax parcels. <br />Schroeder indicated that the property would no longer be contiguous but noted the <br />property could not be developed anyways.