My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
10-13-1997 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
1997
>
10-13-1997 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/1/2023 10:09:37 AM
Creation date
8/1/2023 10:05:55 AM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
408
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
K <br />MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION <br />MEETING HELD ON SEPTEMBER 15,1997 <br />Brooks said it would be superfluous for 905 West Femdale to own it and would make <br />lo^cal sense. He has no plans to improve it and would not object to combining the <br />parcels. He has a scenic easement with John Brooks. This will also improve the views for <br />Mr. Floyd and other neighbors. <br />During public comments, Robert Floyd, 960 West Femdale, reviewed the nine basic points <br />and issues of concern that he noted in a letter received by the Planmng Commission at the <br />meeting. Floyd said a problem with the plan is the instability of the property lines and <br />setting a precedent within Orono regarding redrawing of the area. He is concerned with <br />what happens in the future. Floyd said the City should inform its citizens of what is <br />occurring allowing for others to liave considered this option. Floyd s^d he did not think it <br />was possible for this scenario to occur. Floyd is concerned that this arrangement would <br />present a feeling that property lines are temporary in nature. He indicated the code <br />stipulates that adjacent property owners have to be considered. He noted the goal of the <br />code is to preserve the valuation of the land. He noted the care of the waterway needs <br />utmost consideration. <br />Floyd reviewed problems. He noted the view from over the maple trees is a concern when <br />the trees mature. The channel was noted to be difficult in its habit of filling with sand. A <br />point on Lot 13 was removed to enable navigation of the channel. He questioned what <br />would occur in the future. <br />Floyd questioned whether all of the issues have been reviewed. He referenced the future <br />of the parcel and other subdivisible parcels. He asked what criteria is used. He noted he <br />would be interested in acquiring some of the land in the future and fears that information
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.